Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

And it was a false comparison that showed you don’t understand the issue. The issue is very simple: we have been constantly bombarded by electromagnetic from day one, if they caused cancer, we’d all be dead.

No cellphones don’t magnify the risk. There’s two reasons that’s a stupid statement: 1 there is NO RISK. 2 - we’ve been sticking electromagnetic devices right on our skin for decades before cellphones every existed.

Cancer has increased in time because our life expectancy has increased in time. Cancer is a replication error, the longer you live the more you replicated your cells, eventually errors happen (actually the dirty little secret is these error happen CONSTANTLY, almost everyone you know has cancer, it’s just that most of the time the body eats it and nothing happens).

Nothing I’m saying is based on assumption. It’s all empirical evidence backed by piles of research spanning back decades. Electromagnetics do not cause cancer. Period. Anybody trying to tell you they do is lying to you, they’re probably trying to sell you something stupid. I laughed myself silly when those first hands free devices were marketed as a way around this, first they got people fearing the electromagnetics of the cellphone, then they charged them 40 bucks to stick a magnet IN THEIR EAR. Freaking hilarious.


18 posted on 03/04/2017 3:25:44 PM PST by discostu (There are times when all the world's asleep, the questions run too deep, for such a simple man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

Man, starting from the top of your post - the wheels just fall off your logic and yet you are so sure of yourself.
“if they caused cancer, we’d all be dead” Where did you get that? There are countless cancer causing agents that are not 100% lethal? Radiation, in particular, has a bell shaped curve effect on human health. A rule of thumb coming from the expertise of those who treated Chernobyl victims is that 10% of the population is highly sensitive to exposure, 10% is highly resistant to harmful effects of exposure, the rest are in the middle of the curve surviving or sickening or dying based on immunity, age, treatment etc. Take extreme, immediate exposure like the men in the control room at Chernobyl, about 7 or 8 died grisly deaths and one guy recovered and went on to live a long life. He’d also been exposed to radiation before on a Russian sub and he came through that too. Many of the effects of radiation exposure in the Ukraine fall short of death but result in poor health and suffering. So no, there’s no logic to the statement that these items would have caused us all to die. No truth at all.

You are apparently unaware of the reasons we all must sign liability wavers when we receive dental xrays or other radiologic services. The BEIR reports documenting decades of medical studies involving radiation and cancer will help you come up to speed on cancer in human populations. Happy reading.


19 posted on 03/04/2017 3:34:11 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

Just wanna help start your search. Here’s a link from cancer.org identifying a carcinogen not attributed to people living longer:
“There is little doubt that radiation exposure can cause cancer. This has become clear from studies of groups such as the survivors of the atomic blasts in Japan, where the risks of certain cancers such as leukemias and thyroid cancers were higher than normal, as well as from studies of people exposed to medical radiation and in some workplace settings.”

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cancer-among-military-personnel-exposed-to-nuclear-weapons.html


20 posted on 03/04/2017 3:39:46 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson