Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Medallion' Bubble Burts Around The World (Taxicabs)
Zero Hedge ^ | 2-16-17 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 02/16/2017 2:14:42 PM PST by dynachrome

Sandy Spanos is only 58, but now she could lose her house and be unable to pay for treatment for her cancer, which she was diagnosed with two years ago because the reform will leave her and her husband in hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt.

Mrs. Spanos invested in three taxi licenses so she could enter retirement comfortably with a good superannuation, but she said it has all been ripped from her.

“What did I do wrong?” She asked news.com.au.

The Victorian government wants to deregulate the taxi industry by abolishing taxi licenses and introducing a single registration for taxis, hire cars and ride-share services like Uber.

Taxi licenses cost cabbies $500,000 and it’s seen as an investment that will later help fund retirement.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Humor
KEYWORDS: australia; medallion; taxi; uber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
This woman is insane. Story originally from Australia
1 posted on 02/16/2017 2:14:42 PM PST by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Burts typo in original headline


2 posted on 02/16/2017 2:15:22 PM PST by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I’m of the opinion that regulatory or legal changes that cause financial harm are just as much of a “taking” as property taken under eminent domain, therefore individuals damaged must be made whole. I realize this is in Australia and so their legal and regulatory regime will likely operate under different realities, but the principal still stands.


3 posted on 02/16/2017 2:18:47 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Taxi licenses are a pretty shaky investment.

Almost as shaky as trading in your silver and gold for a bunch of zeroes and ones masquerading as money.


4 posted on 02/16/2017 2:19:26 PM PST by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Prices dropped half a mil in NYC.

You bought a few years ago, you got ####ed.

That’s why you don’t buy THREE of anything that expensive.

She forgot to look up “diversify”


5 posted on 02/16/2017 2:19:46 PM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper cbrust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

booo hooo the government wont allow your monopoly to continue.

Send your tears to Ma Bell!


6 posted on 02/16/2017 2:21:48 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Make America Great Again !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

‘individuals damaged must be made whole”

by the taxpayers, as the feral gov’t has no money


7 posted on 02/16/2017 2:22:43 PM PST by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I have never heard of a legitimate reason why taxi licences should cost upwards of a million dollars. If you are arguing safety, then that is best handled with yearly inspections and payment for those. Also, ownership of the medallion is separate from the license to drive, so it has nothing to do with drivers’ skills.


8 posted on 02/16/2017 2:25:16 PM PST by KarlInOhio (a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity - Pres. Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Federal, state and local governments are taxpayer supported entities, yes. Hopefully, outraged taxpayers will penalize stupid behavior and cut off funding to entities causing financial harm to private citizens. Hopefully. Given past reality, that’s a pretty thin hope, but hope springs eternal.


9 posted on 02/16/2017 2:25:26 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“What did I do wrong?” She asked news.com.au.

...

She made a bad investment.


10 posted on 02/16/2017 2:28:06 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

My take is that it was all about bribes and kickbacks


11 posted on 02/16/2017 2:28:31 PM PST by dynachrome (When an empire dies, you are left with vast monuments in front of which peasants squat to defecate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Still, if the government required you to buy a half-million dollar license, and then after you bought it, started letting other people operate for free, they have treated you unfairly. There should be some compensation.

This has been a kind of mafia thing, where medallions or licenses were limited specifically to eliminate competition. Its good to see this come to an end. The free market is a wonderful thing.


12 posted on 02/16/2017 2:28:51 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I drove a cab a billion years ago, near Boston, and medallions were strictly limited, and went for 6 figures back then. You could drive for a company, but couldn’t go gypsy without your own mediallion.

It’s a perfect example of a government controlled market, and completely artificial, so, of course it fails.


13 posted on 02/16/2017 2:31:08 PM PST by Fido969 (IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

“I have never heard of a legitimate reason why taxi licences should cost upwards of a million dollars.”

It is an artificial monopoly created by government for the enrichment of government. The legitimacy is, they can.


14 posted on 02/16/2017 2:31:14 PM PST by Gen.Blather (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marron
Still, if the government required you to buy a half-million dollar license, and then after you bought it, started letting other people operate for free, they have treated you unfairly. There should be some compensation.

You don't buy the licence from the government, you buy it from another driver. There are losers and winner within the market itself.

15 posted on 02/16/2017 2:34:17 PM PST by Fido969 (IN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Its an artificial market. Cities fix the number available...which happens to create value out of thin air that can be sold off by corrupt government officials.

Some counties in California do the same with building permits.

The US does the same with peanuts

Its a longstanding tradition with corrupt gubmint officials.


16 posted on 02/16/2017 2:45:00 PM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marron

The government probably only charges a few hundred bucks...then people start using the artificially constrained market to their advantage, and ‘flip’’ the medallion.

The last one holding the bag loses - think Florida housing bubble.


17 posted on 02/16/2017 2:47:24 PM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dp0622
This is coming soon to the long-haul trucking industry - many mom & pops owning very expensive rigs. With mature driverless protocols, driverless trucks could go many hours beyond what is permitted by human operated. Faster turnarounds and shipments.

Estimates of 15.5 million trucks operate in the U.S.. Of this figure 2 million are tractor trailers. It is an estimated over 3.5 million truck drivers in the U.S. Of that one in nine are independent, a majority of which are owner operators. source

Due to technology, an ugly intractable mess is surging at us.

18 posted on 02/16/2017 2:52:50 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“What did I do wrong?”

ANSWER:
1) You put all your eggs in one basket instead of diversifying.
2) You stupidly leveraged this insanely risky strategy.
3) You invested in a corrupt, rent-seeking scheme that was only profitable due to an artificial scarcity created by government fiat.


19 posted on 02/16/2017 3:01:12 PM PST by Skepolitic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“What did I do wrong?” She asked news.com.au.


She bought a government enforced monopoly. The government changed its mind.


20 posted on 02/16/2017 3:02:46 PM PST by marktwain (We wanted to tell our side of the story. We hope by us telling our story...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson