[rightwingcrazy]

I thought the Tea Party movement was irrelevant, marginal, and ineffective. The TV told me so.

[rfp1234]

More like a douche party.

[stars & stripes forever]

[Their guest, Nancy Gibbs, editor in chief of Time magazine, spoke about the cover this week, which focused on the Women’s March and how it will materialize into a movement.]

I hope they succeed in alienating every normal human being.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The TEA party was about limiting government.

The B party is about getting free stuff.

[Sarah Barracuda]

The only movement the left knows about is a BOWEL movement..since all they do when they protest is poop on cop cars

[McGavin999]

Hmmmm, The Pu**y Party. Catchy. I’m sure that will work out well for them. Especially the costumes that looked like female parts.

They would be the laughingstock of the entire world. I hope they go for it

[SkyDancer]

Nope. They are unorganized for one thing and have no real direction. They’re all over the place and have no focus.

[Calusa]

They’ll never in a million years get that the Tea Party was a spontaneous grassroots movement that grew out of a reaction to the death throes of Keynesian progressivism. They think they can engineer a mirror image from blue Legos.

[butlerweave]

Never happen , the endless river of Obama supplied tax payer funds has dried up , LOL

[Sasparilla]

It will be an Occupy Wall Street redux.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

The "Tea Party" is a grassroots organization or independent thinkers with moral conviction that the "Silent Majority" were being chronically ignored.
The Woman's March was organized by Soros, funded by Soros, and was a "Bait and Switch" movement by which leaders ,chosen by Soros changed the message immediately prior to the march
, and excluded other women's issues because they weren't Liberal concepts that Soros endorsed (ie: illegal migrants,LBGQ?, muslim immigrants, abortion, etc.).

[loveliberty2]

"Ideas have consequences." - Weaver

The underlying idea of the so-called TEA Party was, as the acronym plainly denotes, that citizens are Taxed Enough Already. Such a motivating idea remained alive to give impetus to the 2016 Presidential Campaign for Trump!

On the other hand, the motley crew assembled last week had no such core and freedom-oriented idea. Instead, it centered on the tired old liberal/progressive Democrat insistence on limiting population in order to facilitate more success with their socialistic policies.

Watch the appearance, tone and behavior of the participants in TEA Party marches/Right To Life marches versus the angry, vulgar outrage of last week's crowds.

[Vince Ferrer]

This is actually the beginning of a democrat civil war. Most of the women in this march were lilly whites or lilly white wannabes. But there is an equal power struggle between non-whites to send the white democrats to the end of the line.

[JPG]

After the over-the-top lib media coverage of this wretched ‘march’, it will be interesting to contrast and compare how they cover tomorrow's Right To Life gathering.

[CyberAnt]

As usual, the LEFT does not have a clue what the Tea Party is, nor any revelation on how it was created.

THEREFORE, they have no hope of being able to create something similar.

TO THE LEFT: You just don’t get it !!!

[Freestate316]

What happened to the Coffee Party?

[ManHunter]

I certainly hope so! If the women’s march defines the Democrat Party, they are toast!

[bray]

Don’t think Soros paid $50 million for the Tea Party.

[Organic Panic]

[shhrubbery!]

A lot of women who attended were naive. Liberal maybe, but not radical. They weren't expecting all the profanity and viciousness.

We'll see if these same organizers can draw a similar crowd of women. I suspect they've reached their high water mark already.