Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2017 9:47:26 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

None the less, it was a problem that Apple had to fix and CR wasn’t the only person reporting issue.

Did Apple pull a VW with this new Safari version?

We may see.


2 posted on 01/11/2017 9:55:33 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
A tragic era in American politics...and society...is about to end and yet,here on what is primarily a *political* website,all you can think about is Apple.

Have you ever,ever,ever posted anything on FR connected to elections,courts,societal trends?

No,I didn't think so.

3 posted on 01/11/2017 9:58:27 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
the differences between Apple’s computers and Windows boxes

That's the sort of slimy biased language I expect from the lying leftists in Big Media.

4 posted on 01/11/2017 10:00:51 AM PST by NorthMountain (Northmountain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

So, according to the story, CR made two mistakes:

1)They used the default browser supplied by Apple

and

2) They found a bug in Apple’s software.

Apple’s apologist goes a bit over the top with this defense.


5 posted on 01/11/2017 10:01:58 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Glad to see you posting. Hope this finds you felling better than the other night.


6 posted on 01/11/2017 10:03:13 AM PST by free thinker 03 (Wouldn't it be refreshing if politicians actually listened to the people who elected them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 5thGenTexan; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; ...
Another article on Consumer Reports review of the Apple MacBook Pro and their bogus battery issue which caused them to not recommend it. — PING!


Apple MacBook Pro bogus battery claims by Consumer Reports
Ping!

The latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword "ApplePingList" on FreeRepublic's Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me

8 posted on 01/11/2017 10:07:52 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

For those who don’t know...Intel’s power management is very complex and has evolved over the years.
It is now much simpler to code for but its probably some legacy software that wasn’t quite right with the latest hardware.

Now objectively, Apple did goof on the latest Macbook Pro.
I was all set to buy one and when I saw the result, I picked up a new 2015 instead.


11 posted on 01/11/2017 10:22:37 AM PST by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

“It can also accomplish good things, such as when an auto manufacturer has to go back and modify a faulty suspension system that might cause a rollover during a rapid maneuver to avoid an accident.”

As an aside, not exactly a ‘settled’ notion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_Motor_Corp._v._Consumers_Union_of_the_U.S.,_Inc.


14 posted on 01/11/2017 10:25:36 AM PST by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

It can also accomplish good things, such as when an auto manufacturer has to go back and modify a faulty suspension system that might cause a rollover during a rapid maneuver to avoid an accident. “

Such as Piddle screaming at a driver “if you can’t roll it, I will find someone who can!” paraphrased.

CR isn’t worth the paper it is printed on or the electrons that give their lives for the digital one.


24 posted on 01/11/2017 10:52:39 AM PST by Clay Moore (JRandomFreeper, SWAMPSNIPER RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
When the tests were rerun in Google Chrome, battery life was within acceptable limits.
Why would there be acceptable limits for battery life?
28 posted on 01/11/2017 11:06:11 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Welcome back Swordmaker -— I’m glad to see you have as much energy (and patience) as before. Too bad the surgeons couldn’t have also excised the bubble-headed Apple-haters who plague FR while they were fixing you.

Good to have you back!


29 posted on 01/11/2017 11:30:36 AM PST by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

This reminds me of the Pentium floating point bug.
Intel didn’t want to replace the processor because the average joe would only run across it under certain conditions.

Rather than say thanks. Intel fought replacing it until the low roar became a din and they finally decided to replace it “upon request”.

Seems Apple could have just said, hey thanx! Fixed it and be on there merry way....and hire the guy who set up the test as a QA guru.

But there are still too many Mac v. PC fire breathers and it produces crap articles like these - blame the guys who find and report the bugs.


35 posted on 01/11/2017 11:42:13 AM PST by stylin19a (Hey obamas-it's Ray Charles time - "Hit the Road Jack"...you know the rest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Consumer Reports blew their credibility in the Suzuki Samurai affair IMO.
41 posted on 01/11/2017 12:07:10 PM PST by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of incompetence and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I remember back in the early 80’s CR called the Coleco Adam the “Computer of the Century”. Yeah, right.

Besides erasing any tape media left in the drive when it was turned on, due to the extreme electromagnetic surge on power-up, the power supply for the computer was located in the attached failure-prone printer. So when your printer died or had to be sent off for repairs, no computing.

Also in the late 70’s CR listed as Dangerous and Unacceptable, the front-wheel drive Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon. The reason was that when the test driver swerved the car as hard as he could in one direction and then as hard as he could in the other, and then let go of the steering wheel, the car did not continue in straight line.

WTF??

Apparently the test driver had no idea about driving a front-wheel drive car.

We had a Horizon from 78 to 84. Put a lot of miles on it with no problems.

Of course that may have been because we never swerved the car from side to side as hard as we could and then let go of the steering wheel.


51 posted on 01/12/2017 12:01:24 AM PST by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson