Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
2 posted on
12/22/2016 7:41:31 AM PST by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
3 posted on
12/22/2016 7:42:04 AM PST by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
We clearly need someone to fact-check the fact-checkers.
4 posted on
12/22/2016 7:43:19 AM PST by
LydiaLong
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
. . . and the rest of it he just wasted.
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Speaking of "FAKE", getta load o' them... ummm... headlights.
6 posted on
12/22/2016 7:44:19 AM PST by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com; Lazamataz
This guy needs to pay for sex?
Just Damn. Why look at that hot wife he has. He could tap that every night. Why go elsewhere.
Oh well. Laz! We now have a hottie available for you. Come and get her.
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
You don’t expect him to spend his OWN money on hookers, do you?
8 posted on
12/22/2016 7:44:58 AM PST by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
This is really getting into the prickly weeds, the dirty laundry and the soap operas of Snopes. Not something I’ve spent a lot of time speculating about.
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
At $98K, those aren’t hookers, they’re escorts!
12 posted on
12/22/2016 7:50:00 AM PST by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Has someone checked this on Snopes?
14 posted on
12/22/2016 7:50:41 AM PST by
Fido969
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Very little information provided. Such as who is making this accusation for example. Is it just gateway pundit?
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Very little information provided. Such as who is making this accusation for example. Is it just gateway pundit?
Never mind, I missed the Daily Caller reference.
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Facebook Fact Checker
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Are those Hostess Snowballs or wrinkly boobs?
Anything that takes Snopes down is fine by me.
22 posted on
12/22/2016 8:12:40 AM PST by
bgill
(From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Free Republic has known for years that Snopes is unreliable. We’ve long known that it slants sharply left for any question even remotely connected to politics.
23 posted on
12/22/2016 8:15:47 AM PST by
xzins
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
24 posted on
12/22/2016 8:16:35 AM PST by
PMAS
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
I’m going to Snopes to see if this is true.
27 posted on
12/22/2016 8:23:38 AM PST by
aquila48
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
Guilty ... on account of her being a slut
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
30 posted on
12/22/2016 8:35:45 AM PST by
steve8714
(My wife calls me Dr. Smartacus. This makes me happy.)
To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
The redhead in that photo certainly has the credentials to be an administrator.
I wonder if http://www.snopes.com will have an article debunking the story....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
