Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swordmaker

Actually, I state the truth, you post propaganda

obviously you don’t like that.

Those iPhones were bricked by Apple and Apple’s response was “Buy a new iPhone”

You try to bring in stuff that either, never happened, or has nothing to do with what we are talking about.

I proved you wrong numerous times, and one of your responses to me was “I was joking” so, are you running the Apple parody joke ping?


20 posted on 12/09/2016 9:06:41 PM PST by arl295
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: arl295
Those iPhones were bricked by Apple and Apple’s response was “Buy a new iPhone”

No iPhones were bricked permanently or deliberately as is being planned here by Samsung. As usual what you are talking about is irrelevant to this thread. . . and false as I pointed out. If anyone said "Buy a new iPhone," it was not an official Apple position. As I pointed out in my original response to you, within a week, every so-called bricked iPhone was back to normal and most within a few hours. YOU LIE.

I proved you wrong numerous times, and one of your responses to me was “I was joking” so, are you running the Apple parody joke ping?

You have NEVER proved me wrong. For example in the last go around on this you posted a single article citing TWO fires related to the iPhone 7 from September 27th claiming that proved your contention that iPhones were as equivalently dangerous as the Samsung Galaxy Note 7. When challenged to come up with any following examples, you proceeded to post the SAME DAMN LINK EIGHT TIMES claiming that was sufficient proof. When challenged to find any subsequent proof, you posted the SAME LINK AGAIN! That is not proving me wrong. You've done the same delusional thing over and over again, while I have repeatedly refuted your claims WITH LINKS TO EVIDENCE proving you're wrong, multiple times, on your bogus claims.

This is just another one of those claims. And you conflate a few minor complaints affecting a small number of Apple iPhone users into a general issue when it was NOT anything of the kind. Then you attack me when I refute that your lying distortions. You do it in almost every thread that can at all be associated with Apple products. You are obsessed. Give it a rest.

Your extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. Prove that large numbers of Apple iPhone users had their iPhones deliberately and permanently "Bricked" and had to purchase new iPhones to replace these bricked iPhones.

Don't try to use the infamous "Error 53" issue to claim this "bricking." Apple's end user license already warns the user of this result as possible if a repair is done not using certified Apple parts. That is a security issue with people who used these non-Apple parts and discovered there is a SECURITY cost attached with doing so. . . that such non-Apple parts don't register their security codes and cannot BE updated without having those non-Apple parts replaced with ones that can be registered with the other Apple parts in the device. Otherwise stolen phones could be re-activated by replacing certain parts, and the owner's user data would be compromised. Apple was perfectly willing to replace the parts and re-register the security of those compromised devices for a repair fee, and would not have suggested "buy a new device." It was a known issue."

Your ignorance is not my problem or Apple's.

25 posted on 12/10/2016 12:01:29 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson