Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Galaxy Note 7 broke basic engineering rules, says damning new report
Digital Trends ^ | December 5, 2016 — 5:19 AM | By Andy Boxall

Posted on 12/05/2016 3:44:55 PM PST by Swordmaker


A teardown of the Galaxy Note 7 may have provided insight into why the infamous smartphone was prone to explosions, causing Samsung to recall and eventually cancel the device entirely. While it’s obvious the battery was a key reason for the device’s failure, a damning new report from a third-party shows what may be the underlying cause.

After acquiring a Galaxy Note 7 — no easy feat once the phones were recalled — engineers with manufacturing technology company Instrumental stripped the phone down to see what was going on inside (and yes, they had a fire extinguisher nearby, just in case). They discovered the battery was so tightly packed inside the Galaxy Note 7’s body that any pressure from battery expansion, or stress on the body itself, may squeeze together layers inside the battery that are never supposed to touch — with explosive results.

More: Samsung’s battery-making arm loses market value after Note 7 debacle

Batteries swell up under normal use, and we place stress on a phone’s body by putting it our pocket and sitting down, or if it’s dropped. Tolerances for battery expansion are built into a smartphone during design, and Instrumental notes Samsung used “a super-aggressive manufacturing process to maximize capacity.”  In other words, the Galaxy Note 7 was designed to be as thin and sleek as possible, while containing the maximum battery capacity for long use, thereby better competing against rival devices such as the iPhone 7 Plus and improving on previous Note models.

Teardown shows tiny space between Galaxy Note 7 body and battery

Teardown shows space between Galaxy Note 7 body and battery

Instrumental.ai

The report speculates that any pressure placed on the battery in its confined space may have squeezed together positive and negative layers inside the cell itself, which were thinner than usual in the Note 7’s battery already, causing them to touch, heat up, and eventually in some cases, catch fire. Delving deeper into the design, the engineers say the space above a battery inside a device needs a “ceiling” that equates to approximately 10 percent of the overall thickness. The Galaxy Note 7 should have had a 0.5mm ceiling; it had none.

“It breaks such a basic rule, it must have been intentional,” says the Instrumental team, adding, “they shipped a dangerous product.”

The Galaxy Note 7 fiasco may cost Samsung more than $20 billion, and reports of this nature won’t help re-establish trust in the brand. However, it’s worth repeating this isn’t a Samsung report, so none of the findings are official, and that Instrumental itself produces software and equipment for quality testing in manufacturing. This means that although it has a strong understand of what it’s looking at, it is also promoting its own products and solutions in this market.

Samsung’s next major smartphone release is expected to be the Galaxy S8, due sometime in early 2017, according to rumors.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: firesexplosions; galaxynote7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: Swordmaker

I’ve had a S7 Edge for 2 months and absolutely love it for its’ performance, screen resolution and aesthetics!!!

In addition, Samsung’s chairman doesn’t falsely & blasphemously proclaim homosexuals are “God’s special people”. “Thimmy” is pure satanic evil.


61 posted on 12/06/2016 5:07:07 AM PST by newfreep ("If Lyin' Ted was an American citizen, he would be a traitor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

This guy’s stunning repartee must be withering. How do you stand it?   =;^)


62 posted on 12/06/2016 12:54:55 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The future doesn't belong to the fainthearted. It belongs to the brave. - - Ronaldus Magnus Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson