Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/23/2016 2:34:58 PM PST by GoldenState_Rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GoldenState_Rose

I had to turn him down, my sock drawer needed organizing.


2 posted on 11/23/2016 2:36:03 PM PST by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

No one honest and God fearing wants anything do with the State Dept.


3 posted on 11/23/2016 2:36:17 PM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I don’t know but honestly, I’ll be very upset if he picks Romney. I’m not opposed to him considering Carley Fiorina.


4 posted on 11/23/2016 2:38:06 PM PST by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I am just hoping they don’t get their own personal email server.


5 posted on 11/23/2016 2:40:55 PM PST by boycott (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

Maybe he floated Romney so we’ll except whomever else he selects. I was completely against Bolton but now that Romney is getting such a big push by CNN and the likes of Joe Scarborough I am willing to accept just about anyone else.


6 posted on 11/23/2016 2:41:11 PM PST by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose
Why Are Trump's Sec of State options so limited?!

Because he doesn't want to pick another loser like Clinton or Kerry.

9 posted on 11/23/2016 2:43:20 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose
Secretary of State is becoming a political plum -- a prize for leading politicians.

I guess it has been like that in the past at certain times, but no president is going to pick an obscure academic like Dean Rusk for State now.

That may not be a bad thing, when you consider the Rusk years.

13 posted on 11/23/2016 2:47:20 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I was just having this conversation with a member of a think tank today. They raised two points that I hadn’t considered.

1. No single establishment group was more opposed to Trump than the Republican foreign policy apparatus. Hundreds signed letters against him. Many of the prominent members voted for Hillary. Thus his pool is very limited.

2. He would have a difficult time picking Bolton or someone aligned closely with the Bush administration given his statements on the Iraq war. It might be considered a reversal of sorts. Such considerations limit his pool still further.

I’m not suggesting there aren’t other reasons as well. But, those struck me as two good observations.


21 posted on 11/23/2016 3:22:18 PM PST by shadowfighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

Romney...not my choice.
Bolton could do a good job, also Rudy could do a good job .... or maybe X Y or Z
but it needs someone strong who will CLEAN HOUSE of all the Nazis and Nazi-wannabees in the SnakeDept
and that’s hundreds of people to clean out of there! its been infamous as a snake pit for years, even before Obama (and he’s packed it with many more IslamoNazis and commie types, all anti-American to the core). NEEDS someone who will CLEAN IT OUT! Think Hercules at the Aegean Stables...


23 posted on 11/23/2016 4:13:42 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose
Why are Trump's Sec of State options so Limited?

I'm available....

25 posted on 11/23/2016 4:34:01 PM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I am fine with romney. It shuts up the back stabbing republicans and solidifies 2020. I think trump is more interested in his domestic agenda.


28 posted on 11/23/2016 4:49:16 PM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I see the stir the pot and bitch about winning crowd is still at it.


31 posted on 11/24/2016 4:00:23 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I think Trump is going to do what Nixon did.
Pick someone to be the placeholder foreign policy-wise at State - Schultz SOS. The real policy will flow through the National Security Advisor (NSA) - Kissinger. If that’s the case sure it can be Romney, he can manage the place maybe even use his business skills to make more efficient administratively. Let Flynn make and execute policy, Romney can add SOS to his resume & go to ceremonies.

Though on first principles I would prefer someone other then Romney.


39 posted on 11/24/2016 6:36:33 PM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose
What is the deal?

The balance of power in the Senate is only 52-48, and two of those Republicans are John McCain and Lindsey Graham.
40 posted on 11/24/2016 6:38:12 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GoldenState_Rose

I’ve had the same thought.

There are some interesting posts on the thread that may partially answer it...foreign policy guys were strongly opposed to him, he’s got to deal with the McCains and Grahams in the party etc.

I just can’t imagine it’s down to Rudy, Romney or Bolton.


44 posted on 11/24/2016 6:50:03 PM PST by SE Mom (proud Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson