Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Hillary lie? Sell government favors? Responsible Middle East Meltdown & growth of ISIS?
Breaking News ^ | 10/23/16

Posted on 10/23/2016 10:00:01 AM PDT by DBCJR

Does Hillary Actually Lie?

Many who have followed Hillary's flip-flops on her positions, and outright denials of previous positions, tend to think so. During a private 2013 speech to the National Multifamily Housing Council, Clinton talked about how the horse-trading of politics looks bad to the public, necessitating the creation of a separate public position that doesn’t reflect one’s actual views, quoted below:

“You just have to sort of figure out how to … balance the public and the private efforts that are necessary to be successful, politically, and that’s not just a comment about today,” Clinton said. “Politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.”

Whether this is overtly deceptive or politically sociopathic, it is a lie. While some believe she may be lying for the greater good, others like Obama in 2008, claiming she took more from Wall Street than any other candidate, believe she is in it for the money. Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department

Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East. Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region's fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Department’s documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.

Under Clinton's leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure -- derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) -- represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period. American defense contractors also donated to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and in some cases made personal payments to Bill Clinton for speaking engagements. Such firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of Pentagon-negotiated deals that were authorized by the Clinton State Department between 2009 and 2012. The State Department formally approved these arms sales even as many of the deals enhanced the military power of countries ruled by authoritarian regimes whose human rights abuses had been criticized by the department. Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar all donated to the Clinton Foundation and also gained State Department clearance to buy caches of American-made weapons even as the department singled them out for a range of alleged ills, from corruption to restrictions on civil liberties to violent crackdowns against political opponents. Hillary Clinton Email Archive Reveals: NOT Fit A Hillary Clinton email has just emerged that is so ironic—and tragic—it's obvious why she deleted it, never wanting it to see the light of day. In emails sent one week after becoming Secretary of State, using her private email and server, Mrs. Clinton admitted to CentCom Commander, Army General David Petraeus that she knew using her private BlackBerry phone wasn't secure. In another, she admits she had been told not to use her private email for security reasons, and a third instructs him to use her private email. She knew it was a violation of national security and she did it anyway. Is this who you want as the central focus of all our most top secret information? General Petraeus, a highly decorated general of Special Forces and CentCom Commander, was fired for a small fraction of what Hillary did. WIKILEAKS: Emails Show Hillary Clinton Selling Access to Human Rights-Abusing Government of Morocco The Clinton Global Initiative conference in Marrakesh, hosted by Moroccan King Mohammed VI, was a lavish affair funded by a $1 million contribution from OCP, a phosphate conglomerate owned by the Moroccan royal family. Politico reported at the time that Hillary was “unlikely” to attend the CGI event, although former President Bill Clinton did make an appearance at the ritzy gathering, where he cited “Morocco’s longstanding friendship to my family,” and personally thanked King Mohammed, who pledged as much as $500,000 to the construction toward the construction of the Clinton Library in Arkansas. The Moroccan government is one of several foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation that have been widely denounced for abusing human rights. Amnesty International, in a report published several days after the CGI conference in 2015, blasted the Moroccan government for its abusive treatment of political prisoners. The Middle East Forum has released its 2015-16 “Islamist Money In Politics” list, charting the top ten recipients of contributions from Islamic organizations — and Hillary Clinton is at the top of the list. Hillary Clinton has been a fierce critic of Donald Trump’s proposal for a freeze on Muslim immigration to the United States until we can identify an effective vetting process to know who we are letting in. She claims that Trump is a racist but might there be another reason?

Beyond political donations, the Clinton Foundation has received millions from Islamic countries. Saudi Arabia, dominated by radical Sunni fundamentalists and ruled by Sharia law, donated up to $50 million to the Clinton Foundation, while the Emirate of Qatar has donated between $1 million and $5 million.

According to Clinton’s own State Department, Qatar’s human rights violations include “trafficking in persons … legal, institutional, and cultural discrimination against women limited their participation in society.”

How did the Clintons get so WEALTHY on government salaries? This is the question you must answer before you vote in November. Hillary states that she is the candidate of the common person, the one standing against Wall Street. But what is the truth? Notice in the chart above that the rise in Clinton wealth is coincident with Hillary's term as Secretary of State. The documentary Clinton Cash documents exactly HOW this occurred. Watch this documentary and see that Hillary sold government influence for large donations to the Clinton Foundation, like approving sale of 20% of American uranium deposits for $250 million. according to the New York Times. This is NOT extraordinary as Bill Clinton approved sale of missile guidance technology to China for a major campaign contribution. Before President Clinton approved the sale of missle guidance technology he knew that China had nuclear warheads and intercontinental ballistic missiles. The missile guidance technology gave China the ability to target 14 American cities, which they did shortly thereafter. Did the Clinton's sell-out America for foreign donations? The Washington Post seems to think so:

Foreign governments gave millions to foundation while Clinton was at State Dept.

"The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday. Most of the contributions were possible because of exceptions written into the foundation’s 2008 agreement, which included limits on foreign-government donations. The agreement, reached before Clinton’s nomination amid concerns that countries could use foundation donations to gain favor with a Clinton-led State Department, allowed governments that had previously donated money to continue making contributions at similar levels. The new disclosures, provided in response to questions from The Washington Post, make clear that the 2008 agreement did not prohibit foreign countries with interests before the U.S. government from giving money to the charity closely linked to the secretary of state." Washington Post

Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.” The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants. That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.

For instance, Mrs. Clinton introduced a bill when she was New York’s junior senator that allowed a donor to the Clinton Foundation to use tax-exempt bonds to build a shopping center in Syracuse, New York, public records show. She also went to bat for Freddie Mac, working to defeat legislation that would have subjected the mortgage giant to tougher regulations before the housing bubble burst and led to a major recession. That same year, Freddie Mac donated $50,000 to $100,000 to her husband’s charity, originally called the William J. Clinton Foundation records show. There seems to be a long history of Pay-To-Play with the Clintons.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; isis; wikileak

1 posted on 10/23/2016 10:00:01 AM PDT by DBCJR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Is the Pope Catholic? Does a bear $hit in the woods?


2 posted on 10/23/2016 10:04:40 AM PDT by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Smarmy in-your-face criminals...


3 posted on 10/23/2016 10:04:53 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Does a rug lie?


4 posted on 10/23/2016 10:05:30 AM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Horse-trading??? (Snort)

More like the optimum way of selling out the bastion of Liberty and Freedom while enriching yourself.

5 posted on 10/23/2016 10:11:49 AM PDT by Kudsman (Trump or bust 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Hillary’s supporters live in a fantasy world in which they believe they are superior in their thinking and understanding of the issues.

There is never a need for them to actually look at the facts when they only follow a few simple rules.

Their first rule is, “All politicians lie” so they don’t care if their Candidate lies.

Next rule, “The opposition will lie about their candidates lies”.

Rule three, “When in doubt, see rule one and two”.


6 posted on 10/23/2016 10:18:18 AM PDT by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

CIRCA 2015 NYP-— The job of Clinton damage control through a parade of scandals has fallen to her top aide (and perennial govt parasite) Cheryl Mills. Mills’ lack of cooperation is legendary. In fact, she’s been officially accused of both perjury and obstruction of justice.

Sworn affidavits, depositions and court rulings, as well as congressional reports and testimony, paint a picture of, to put it charitably, a brazenly dishonest cover-up specialist.

Among Mills shenanigans:

<><> •As White House deputy counsel, Mills ordered Commerce Department officials to “withhold” from investigators emails and other documents detailing then-President Clinton’s and First Lady Hillary Clinton’s allegedly illegal selling of seats on foreign trade junkets for campaign cash, according to sworn statements by Commerce’s former FOIA chief. “Ms. Mills, in her position as deputy counsel to the president, advised Commerce officials to withhold certain documents,” testified Sonya Stewart Gilliam in a July 2000 sworn affidavit taken by Judicial Watch, a government watchdog group in Washington. “The Commerce Department’s collaboration with White House Deputy Counsel Mills on these matters was, in my experience, highly irregular and at variance with normal procedures.

<><> •At the same time, a federal judge ruled that Mills “failed miserably” to take proper steps to search for and recover 1.8 million Executive Office of the President and Office of the First Lady emails under subpoena in the Monica Lewinsky and Filegate scandal investigations, after computer contractors discovered them mysteriously missing from the automated White House archiving system. Mills, who was in charge of finding the lost email, conveniently made “the most critical error” in recovering them.

<><> US District Judge Royce Lamberth concluded in a 63-page opinion, adding that he found Mills actions “loathsome.” In fact, Judicial Watch accused Mills of orchestrating a “cover-up” in what became known as “Email-gate.” Her court testimony in the case, during which she repeatedly answered “I don’t have a recollection,” sounds like an interview with an amnesia patient. (In the end, the emails were never recovered).

<><> •In another scandal, Mills “concealed” so many subpoenaed emails and other documents detailing allegedly illegal fundraising activity between the White House and the Democratic National Committee — specifically, Hillary’s illegal integration of White House and DNC computer databases — that staff lawyers for the House Government Oversight Committee in 1998 sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department demanding federal prosecutors charge Mills with obstruction of justice and perjury. “Ms. Mills knowingly and willfully obstructed the investigative authority of this committee by withholding documents,” the panel concluded in a 647-page investigative report. “Moreover, when this obstruction was brought to light in a hearing before the committee, Ms. Mills lied under oath about the documents and the circumstances surrounding their nonproduction.”

<><> •In October 2012, Mills sorted through key Benghazi documents and decided which ones to withhold from an independent review board. She also leaned on witnessses. Deputy ambassador to Libya Gregory Hicks testified before Congress in 2013 that Mills told him in an angry phone call to stop cooperating with investigators.

<><> •On behalf of the Clintons, Mills negotiated the weak conflict-of-interest rules for disclosing foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation with the Obama administration. She also reportedly helped broker international payments to the group. In short, Mills “is in the middle of it,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

EXCERPT-—http://nypost.com/2015/05/17/hillary-clintons-consigliere-covers-up-for-her-scandals/


7 posted on 10/23/2016 10:33:24 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
Does Hillary lie? Sell government favors? Responsible Middle East Meltdown & growth of ISIS?

Are bears Catholic? Does the Pope......or something like that.

8 posted on 10/23/2016 10:36:32 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Is a duck’s butt water-tight?


9 posted on 10/23/2016 11:24:21 AM PDT by TheConservativeParty (TRUMP 45 Meet the new boss, not the same as any old boss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

That is some real expensive sausage.


10 posted on 10/23/2016 12:19:39 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

Yes, yes, yes, and yes.


11 posted on 10/23/2016 12:49:44 PM PDT by Ray76 (Communism is a lie told by the Prince of Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR

speaking of Morocco, (and countries that get ‘aid’, a portion of which is returned to the Clintons):

U.S. aid to Morocco worries California olive farmers
AGRICULTURE U.S. subsidies to foreign growers worry California farmers By Stacy Finz
Published 4:00 am, Sunday, September 18, 2011

http://www.sfgate.com/food/article/U-S-aid-to-Morocco-worries-California-olive-2309224.php


12 posted on 10/23/2016 1:42:05 PM PDT by blueplum ((March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson