Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lothrop Stoddard and Margaret Sanger

Posted on 10/15/2016 6:24:40 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica

In 1914, the publication Birth Control Review published a review of the book The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy, by Lothrop Stoddard. The review was published by Havelock Ellis, a close friend of Margaret Sanger. Additionally, Stoddard was a board member of Sanger's pride and joy: The American Birth Control League.

To what degree did Sanger agree with the contents of this review? As editor of the magazine, she had the ability to decline/approve anything written in her pages.

The review said: (page 14)

Dr. Stoddard is an American, a graduate of Harvard and a citizen of New York, and like many Americans, aware that they have to attract the attention of a vast hustling audience absorbed in its activities over an enormous area, he is inclined to address it through a megaphone, in the strong, simple, emphatic language that that instrument demands. His message has thus to be a little discounted, but even when that allowance is made it remains a message it concerns us to hear, and it is delivered with force and knowledge. It is well to remember that his conclusions are, after all, fundamentally in harmony with those of sober and judicial observers in Europe, it is enough to mention Professor Demangeon's recent book Le Declin de l'Europe.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: eugenics; margaretsanger; progressingamerica; sanger

1 posted on 10/15/2016 6:24:40 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mvonfr; Southside_Chicago_Republican; celmak; SvenMagnussen; miss marmelstein; ...
If anybody wants on/off the revolutionary progressivism ping list, send me a message

Progressives do not want to discuss their own history. I want to discuss their history.

2 posted on 10/15/2016 6:25:59 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot leave history to "the historians" anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
According to Wikipedia when I last looked him up, Stoddard was a Harvard PhD who actually visited Nazi Germany and visited a German court which decided which people would be involuntarily sterilized.

Far from being scandalized, he thought they were too conservative in their opinions: he said that the eugenics laws were “being administered with strict regard for its provisions and that, if anything, judgments were almost too conservative”, and that the law was “weeding out the worst strains in the Germanic stock in a scientific and truly humanitarian way”.

(Yes, it’s from Wikipedia, but the quotes are linked to books from Oxford University Press and University of Vermont press, with ISBNs which check out. Incidentally, the photo of Stoddard on Wikipedia bears an uncanny resemblance to Snidely Whiplash.)

3 posted on 10/15/2016 6:31:03 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Thamks for posting this.


4 posted on 10/15/2016 6:50:21 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
L Actually L!

Snidely Whiplash for sure!

All yuk-yuking aside, this guy was truly evil: an enemy of the human race. He was a Nazi-racist-eugenicist before any of those were exposed as criminal ideologies they were and (present tense) are.

5 posted on 10/15/2016 7:27:48 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("What people will submit to, is the exact measure of the injustice which will be imposed upon them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
That post was excerpted from my old vanity

(Vanity) This is no Fluke, It's More Like a Hydra

6 posted on 10/15/2016 7:43:17 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Trump should put it this way: “Does any black person know who Margret Sanger was?” Question their intelligence while forcing the media to explain.


7 posted on 10/15/2016 8:15:43 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Interesting connections.


8 posted on 10/15/2016 2:27:42 PM PDT by OldNewYork (Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
Preaching to the choir here of course, but for reference:

Hillary Clinton, accepting the "Margaret Sanger Award" from Planned Parenthood for her "contributions to the advancement of women’s heath care," wow:

“It was a great privilege when I was told that I would receive this award. I admire Margaret Sanger enormously. Her courage, her tenacity, her vision … When I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I’m really in awe of her. There are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life, from the causes she launched and fought for and scarified for so greatly.”

cited from: https://www.truthorfiction.com/hillary-clinton-said-she-admires-margaret-sanger/

9 posted on 10/15/2016 7:51:44 PM PDT by Weirdad (Orthodox Americanism: It's what's good for the world! (Not communofascism!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson