Wall Street Journal Finally Lashes Out "The Press Is Burying Hillary Clinton's Sins"

Zerohedge ^ | 10/14/2016 | Tyler Durden

[Uncle Miltie]

The WSJ is carrying Clinton’s water.

See Rove, Gigot, Stevens.

Liberal Establishment Pussies, all.

[miss marmelstein]

Second thoughts, WSJ??

[Arm_Bears]

Interesting development considering the WSJ has been part of the biased media shielding Hilliary!.

[Uncle Miltie]

Cheap illegal immigrants to mow their lawn for $5.00 / hour is all they care about.

[Vendome]

That the nation now has proof of pretty much everything she has been accused of.

And Comey gave her the immunity idol...

[bigbob]

WSJ editorial has always been more right-leaning than WSJ “news”.

[Rusty0604]

Kimberly Strassel may be out of a job soon.

[Common Sense 101]

Sins? Try treason and crimes...

[Doogle]

Once they start....it’s all gonna come down....

[miss marmelstein]

Which one is that? The really corporate type who shows up on Morning Joe on occasion?

In a weird way, I would almost want Clinton to win just to see the smirk wiped off these rotten globalists as they regret their constant nastiness towards Trump.

[miss marmelstein]

Yup!

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Cheap illegal immigrants to mow their lawn for $5.00 / hour is all they care about.

I want to know where these "Cheap illegal immigrants" that work for $5.00 an hour are. When I had to hire a lawn service because my husband had back surgery it was $50.00 for what was about a 1/2 hour job.

Cheaper then having to deal with the city but still, I keep hearing about all these illegals that will work cheap but I can't find 'em.

[Cboldt]

-- The WSJ is carrying Clinton's water. --

Yes it is. A story about "burying Clinton stories" is another example of all talk, no action. The Clinton stories are still buried. We get it.

[Rurudyne]

Her own people referred to their base as “the Red Army”?

Anyone know which email that was in? It’ll be choice to present to those left wing loons who somehow insists that they aren’t communists.

[Freedom56v2]

bump

[lilypad]

The problem with the wsj is today they may have a decent article and then for the next 3 days every one of them is trash... Like Brett Stephens writes. (Why I cancelled my two subscriptions).

[burghguy]

No, I think not. She is the designated Conservative on the editorial side. Actually, she is a good journalist. I always read her columns.

[miss marmelstein]

That’s too bad. It used to be a great paper. I lost hope when Dorothy Rabinowitz who I used to admire started sneering at Trump. That did it. Let her put up with HC for the next 4 years!

[Rusty0604]

I don’t know, she is the author of this WSJ article.