Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton would make a sober, smart and pragmatic president. Trump would be a catastrophe. (tr)
L.A. Times ^ | Sep 23, 2016 | L.A. Times Editorial Board

Posted on 09/25/2016 7:01:45 AM PDT by dayglored

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: dayglored

Replace “Clinton” with “Ted Bundy,” “Scott Peterson,” “Idi Amin,” etc....and it would read the same thing, as long as that individual was a Democrat.


21 posted on 09/25/2016 7:21:30 AM PDT by gopno1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

As a first lady, a Democratic senator from New York and secretary of State in President Obama’s first term, she immersed herself in the details of government...

Her hands have been in the till all along.
I wouldn’t trust her with the change I find
in the laundry.

She is mean and it shows in her face.
Were she to win, one can be assured
that those who didn’t vote for her
would pay a terrible price.


22 posted on 09/25/2016 7:23:09 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft
Sam? .... name ends in a vowel guy.

The name Rayburn comes to mind. Could that be it?

23 posted on 09/25/2016 7:23:35 AM PDT by Rapscallion (OBAMA and Clinton: Defiantly destroying America one deranged decision at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Drunk (on power, at a minimum), diabolical and crooked is more like it.


24 posted on 09/25/2016 7:25:23 AM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
yeah, wonder why the felt the need to put SOBER in there?

her sobriety becoming an issue???

25 posted on 09/25/2016 7:25:58 AM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

Eyetalian mafia...


26 posted on 09/25/2016 7:28:54 AM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Slimes of a feather ...


27 posted on 09/25/2016 7:28:57 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

This is why the L A Times is given away free. The streets are littered with their throwaway copies.


28 posted on 09/25/2016 7:29:53 AM PDT by oldbrowser (Clinton Foundation donations must be turned over to the U.S. like any other gifts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Just more proof we live in the End of Days.


29 posted on 09/25/2016 7:29:53 AM PDT by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Why does the LA Times still bother to publish an English edition?


30 posted on 09/25/2016 7:32:44 AM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

This should be a prime example why newspapers should not choose sides.

Those that already support Clinton will embrace the articles, those that support Trump will ignore it. The article will not influence anyone to change their minds.

However, if the LA Times had a reputation as being honest and fair in it’s reporting, an article like this could sway some to support Clinton (of course that assuming the same article would be written if they were fair and honest. I don’t think so.)

The American people would be safe to assume anything written by the LA Times (or the NY Times, on most other major city newspapers) is nothing more than a campaign ad by the Democrats.

Today’s newspapers lost their reputation for honesty and fairness years ago, it is no wonder they are going the way of the DoDo bird.


31 posted on 09/25/2016 7:34:08 AM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
They live in a Potemkin village.
32 posted on 09/25/2016 7:35:06 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
Hillary Clinton would make a sober, smart and pragmatic president.

What kind of prostitute do have have to be to allow such idiotic statements to appear in your newspaper?

33 posted on 09/25/2016 7:37:49 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Hillary smart??? Where is the evidence of that?


34 posted on 09/25/2016 7:39:46 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

As long as the definition of “Smart, Sober and Pragmatic” includes being a long-term alcoholic/mean drunk, destroying the Middle East and selling influence to the highest bidder (usually Saudi Arabia) then I have to concede that the L.A. Times has a point.


35 posted on 09/25/2016 7:40:42 AM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Hillary is neither sober or smart. Her pragmatism is limited to exploiting influence for personal gain.


36 posted on 09/25/2016 7:41:59 AM PDT by Mjreagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Suuurprise! I’m waiting for the Washington Post’s impending endorsement.

Then the three-legged MSM trifecta will be complete.


37 posted on 09/25/2016 7:47:00 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

Is this headline for people that have spent the last 20 years under a ROCK ,LOL


38 posted on 09/25/2016 7:52:11 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Hillary smart??? Where is the evidence of that?

She is not in prison.

39 posted on 09/25/2016 7:55:41 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion
The name Rayburn comes to mind. Could that be it?

More likely, it's Sam Giancana. He was the head of the Chicago mob when JFK was running for president. Jack Kennedy's father paid him to make sure that Kennedy won Chicago and Illinois.

Sam Giancana, fully expecting expecting to be rewarded handsomely when Kennedy won, was horrified when JFK appointed his brother Bobby as Attorney general.

Bobby Kennedy, instead of reciprocating by giving Giancana political cover, targeted and went after Giancana like they were "enemies going back to the old neighborhood".

Giancana wanted Bobby out of his hair.

Giancana said "If you want to kill a snake, you don't try to cut off its' tail, because the head will just come around and bite you, but if you cut off the head of the snake, the body dies."

So (rumor has it) Giancana had JFK whacked, effectively depriving Bobby of his power as attorney general.

Around five years later, somebody had Bobby whacked. Payback can be a bitch sometimes.

40 posted on 09/25/2016 8:01:04 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson