Ruthlessness seems to be a common trait of the left.
Alinsky's rules are standard rules of rhetoric, and they work for anti-NWO types just as well as the mutant radical turned globalist types. Better in fact, because it is a program for dissent and change for populists.
Example - Rule no 5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating."
Eg. Basket of Deplorables. You don't debate it. You embrace it and laugh. Everytime Hillary says something you interrupt and respond, but I am Deplorable. As Alinsky says, there is no comeback.
Or - Rule no 4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
Or the Rule that Trump embodies RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
Alinsky dedicates his book to Lucifer, but the connection between these two is far greater. It has to do with their primary role in the world.
Exactly like the serpent in the Garden, Alinsky portrays himself as desiring good fruit for others.
But while he brings them nothing but evil fruit, Alinsky reaches for his true objective: stealing authority from its rightful owner.
This is the same with Hillary.
Bookmark
The mainstream media have never investigated Hillary’s ties to Saul Alinsky.
When we hear about “media bias”, there are various levels of bias.
There is the slanted news coverage, editing of interviews, the talking heads analyses, etc. which convey a certain point of view.
Then there is also the mass of stories which the media simply ignore. And the subject of Hillary’s ties to Saul Alinsky is one such story which the media have decided to ignore.