Posted on 09/08/2016 12:46:49 AM PDT by LibWhacker
The discovery of two massive holes punched through a stream of stars could help answer questions about the nature of dark matter, the mysterious substance holding galaxies together.
Researchers have detected two massive holes which have been ‘punched’ through a stream of stars just outside the Milky Way, and found that they were likely caused by clumps of dark matter, the invisible substance which holds galaxies together and makes up a quarter of all matter and energy in the universe.
The scientists, from the University of Cambridge, found the holes by studying the distribution of stars in the Milky Way. While the clumps of dark matter that likely made the holes are gigantic in comparison to our Solar System – with a mass between one million and 100 million times that of the Sun – they are actually the tiniest clumps of dark matter detected to date.
The results, which have been submitted to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, could help researchers understand the properties of dark matter, by inferring what type of particle this mysterious substance could be made of. According to their calculations and simulations, dark matter is likely made up of particles more massive and more sluggish than previously thought, although such a particle has yet to be discovered.
“While we do not yet understand what dark matter is formed of, we know that it is everywhere,” said Dr Denis Erkal from Cambridge’s Institute of Astronomy, the paper’s lead author. “It permeates the universe and acts as scaffolding around which astrophysical objects made of ordinary matter – such as galaxies – are assembled.”
Current theory on how the universe was formed predicts that many of these dark matter building blocks have been left unused, and there are possibly tens of thousands of small clumps of dark matter swarming in and around the Milky Way. These small clumps, known as dark matter sub-haloes, are completely dark, and don’t contain any stars, gas or dust.
Dark matter cannot be directly measured, and so its existence is usually inferred by the gravitational pull it exerts on other objects, such as by observing the movement of stars in a galaxy. But since sub-haloes don’t contain any ordinary matter, researchers need to develop alternative techniques in order to observe them.
The technique the Cambridge researchers developed was to essentially look for giant holes punched through a stream of stars. These streams are the remnants of small satellites, either dwarf galaxies or globular clusters, which were once in orbit around our own galaxy, but the strong tidal forces of the Milky Way have torn them apart. The remnants of these former satellites are often stretched out into long and narrow tails of stars, known as stellar streams.
“Stellar streams are actually simple and fragile structures,” said co-author Dr Sergey Koposov. “The stars in a stellar stream closely follow one another since their orbits all started from the same place. But they don’t actually feel each other’s presence, and so the apparent coherence of the stream can be fractured if a massive body passes nearby. If a dark matter sub-halo passes through a stellar stream, the result will be a gap in the stream which is proportional to the mass of the body that created it.”
The researchers used data from the stellar streams in the Palomar 5 globular cluster to look for evidence of a sub-halo fly-by. Using a new modelling technique, they were able to observe the stream with greater precision than ever before. What they found was a pair of wrinkled tidal tails, with two gaps of different widths.
By running thousands of computer simulations, the researchers determined that the gaps were consistent with a fly-by of a dark matter sub-halo. If confirmed, these would be the smallest dark matter clumps detected to date.
“If dark matter can exist in clumps smaller than the smallest dwarf galaxy, then it also tells us something about the nature of the particles which dark matter is made of – namely that it must be made of very massive particles,” said co-author Dr Vasily Belokurov. “This would be a breakthrough in our understanding of dark matter.”
The reason that researchers can make this connection is that the mass of the smallest clump of dark matter is closely linked to the mass of the yet unknown particle that dark matter is composed of. More precisely, the smaller the clumps of dark matter, the higher the mass of the particle.
Since we do not yet know what dark matter is made of, the simplest way to characterise the particles is to assign them a particular energy or mass. If the particles are very light, then they can move and disperse into very large clumps. But if the particles are very massive, then they can’t move very fast, causing them to condense – in the first instance – into very small clumps.
“Mass is related to how fast these particles can move, and how fast they can move tells you about their size,” said Belokurov. “So that’s why it’s so interesting to detect very small clumps of dark matter, because it tells you that the dark matter particle itself must be very massive.”
“If our technique works as predicted, in the near future we will be able to use it to discover even smaller clumps of dark matter,” said Erkal. “It’s like putting dark matter goggles on and seeing thousands of dark clumps each more massive than a million suns whizzing around.”
Black Matter Lives!
Dark Matter - The Global Warming of Astrophysics..........
Dark matter has never been shown to exist. It’s never been detected or described. But to make the math work in some models they pretend its there. The king has no clothes.
just as long as the massive hole is not on Uranus, Im good
You could not resist the temptation, eh ?
Like the cosmological constant?
I thought Cambridge was a good school.
did u at least giggle ?
Of course I did.
Einstein proved that the ether did not exist, so you can understand my confusion about what you wrote.
I giggled too...must have been a dark matter stream that caught and swept all of us up and out thru...where else, but Uranus!
Maybe it was a cloaked Romulan warbird.
You might want to relook at your supposition.
http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Extras/Einstein_ether.html
http://zionism-israel.com/Albert_Einstein/Albert_Einstein_Ether_Relativity.htm
Before Einstein, the ether meant one thing. After Einstein, a different thing was given the label “ether”. So when I say that Einstein disproved the existence of the ether, I mean the original definition.
If you were going to criticize anything, you should have said that Einstein only explained what Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley had proven by experiment in 1887.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.