Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing 747 - it was nice knowin ya!

Posted on 08/22/2016 11:57:32 AM PDT by djf

I was just talking to my neighbor who has a son that works in Everett.

He says the last 747 is expected to come off the line in late September, this year!

In my mind, this is just about the last thing I would recommend. Take a hiatus if you need one. But don't spend all your gumption on the 787.

Stick to planes that WORK! Like the 737...

Thoughts?


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 747; aerospace; boeing; manufacturing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: djf

There’s very little demand for the 747 anymore. Planes with four engines have been on the decline for many years. Engines are more reliable and powerful these days, so only two are needed and much more economical than four.


21 posted on 08/22/2016 12:15:36 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
Only did one round trip on a 747 (NY-Tokyo), but compared to all of the many jets I've been on, it was one sweet ride.
Most impressive was the take off ... wheels off the ground and whooosh straight up!
22 posted on 08/22/2016 12:15:43 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

Time marches on, old airframes become post dated, orders switch to the new frames, icons become dinosaurs.


23 posted on 08/22/2016 12:16:04 PM PDT by discostu (If you need to load or unload go to the white zone, you'll love it, it's a way of life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

747 has nearly double the seating capacity in a standard layout.


24 posted on 08/22/2016 12:16:31 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

What’s wrong with the 787? I’ve flown all over Asia on them. Awesome planes, those.

...

They are, but they are a huge financial mistake for Boeing. If they remain popular for 20 years Boeing may break even on them.


25 posted on 08/22/2016 12:17:24 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
One of the last 747-8s to roll off the assembly line, if not the very last, will be replacement aircraft for Air Force One.

Correct. It's likely the last two 747's ever built will be the replacement for the VC-25A that have served the USAF since 1989.

What will replace the 747? Mostly likely, 777-8 and 777-9. The 777-8 will likely spawn a 777-8F freighter version.

26 posted on 08/22/2016 12:18:26 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: djf

I e always enjoyed flying on the 747. It was just incredible in the early 70s. I remember taking the Everett plant tour around 1975 and seeing them getting built. I still can see the videos of the wing stress tests and the test takeoff with too much rotation and the tail dragging a couple of hundred yards down the runway. Spectacular!

The FAA rerouted international flights in the SF Bay Area and I’m now treated to several a day making u-turns over my house at 5,000 feet. Good God they are LOUD.


27 posted on 08/22/2016 12:21:06 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

My daughter took the Boeing plant tour about a year ago and said the security was very intense.

Was in the same way in 1975?

.

.


28 posted on 08/22/2016 12:23:32 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: djf

If it ain’t Boeing, I ain’t going.


29 posted on 08/22/2016 12:24:20 PM PDT by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

Qantas told me the 380 is used on L.A. - Sydney runs but it does not have the capacity to go Sydney - Dallas. The 747 is required for that, and I have taken it many times.


30 posted on 08/22/2016 12:25:54 PM PDT by TRY ONE (I never got the memo changing the name of Global Warming to Klimate Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: djf
The flight I took to Europe on a 787 Dreamliner is by far the best flying experience I've ever had. San Francisco to London in United Business First sleeper cabin.

The 787's LED interior lighting that simulates the position of the sun in your destination's time zone and the cabin pressurization that is tuned to simulate 4500' altitude instead of 7500' altitude makes for a cruise ship-like journey. I think the 787 is the passenger jet by which all others are judged.

Only other long distance flight I've had that was as comfortable was flying a Dutch KLM red eye flight in an nearly empty 747 that was apparently ferrying cargo to Amsterdam instead of passengers. First class was filled, but the rest of the plane had maybe twenty passengers onboard. I took a whole six-person row to myself and made a little fort out of pillows and blankets. Like flying to Europe sleeping on a living room couch. Wasn't bad at all. The cabin crew were really happy to be going home with very little to do so they just uncorked a few bottles of champagne and set it out for "Serve yourself" while they slept.

I've had some pretty miserable flights too, I admit.

31 posted on 08/22/2016 12:26:32 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE
It was my understanding that the 747 was the only jumbo that could make it that far

The longest range 747 doesn't even make the top 5.

"The Boeing 777-200LR is the world's longest range airliner with a range of 17,395km (9,395nmi). The aircraft was rolled out by Boeing in February 2005 and can carry 301 passengers in a typical three-class configuration."

"The A340-500 is the world's second longest range airliner, allowing for a maximum distance of 16,670km (9,000nmi) with flight durations of up to 19 hours."

"The Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner, with a range of 14,800km to 15,750km (8,000nmi to 8,500nmi), stands third "

The 380 is in fourth place, followed by the 787-8. The 747-8 is in 6th place, followed by the 350-1000, the 340-600, 777-300ER, and the 350-900.

http://www.aerospace-technology.com/features/feature-the-longest-range-airliners-in-the-world/

32 posted on 08/22/2016 12:27:38 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

I know.

I’m under the southern approach for SeaTac and the northern approach for McChord!

Sometimes about 4 in the morning I’ll hear a screech and a roar and will look up...

About three months ago I saw two planes, both commercial, one headed south, one headed northwest, only about two hundred feet clearance from each other, (one was higher the other was beneath it) I almost called the tower to see if they even knew about it.


33 posted on 08/22/2016 12:27:59 PM PDT by djf ("She wore a raspberry beret, the kind you find in a second hand store..." - Prince)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring; djf

They are definitely not stopping 747s entirely. Other aircraft like the 787 don’t fit in the same market niche. The niches are determined by the ratio of range to capacity. Boeing needs to have an offering across the range of markets or they will lose out to Airbus.

The confusions here probably comes from the composite version not being built on the same manufacturing line. It needs different tooling.


34 posted on 08/22/2016 12:31:44 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE
Qantas told me the 380 is used on L.A. - Sydney runs but it does not have the capacity to go Sydney - Dallas. The 747 is required for that, and I have taken it many times.

"From 28 April 2016, Qantas will be operating daily round trip non-stop A380 services between Dallas/Fort Worth and Sydney, Australia, offering customers convenient connections on our codeshare partner American Airlines from over 50 cities in North America into DFW. +http://www.qantas.com/travel/airlines/dfw-texas-australia-deals/us/en

Maybe they forgot to tell the crew. My recollection is that it does have to stop in Brisbane on the way back because of fuel issues westbound.

35 posted on 08/22/2016 12:32:44 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“They are, but they are a huge financial mistake for Boeing. If they remain popular for 20 years Boeing may break even on them.”

True, But the technology they developed for the 787 is paying off in the new 737. That way the 737 (their big money maker) does not have the same teething problems. So in the end the 787 will probably be a big win even if it does not look like that on paper.


36 posted on 08/22/2016 12:36:25 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Only if the new tech, and processes they spent money on, are only used for the 787, then I’d agree with you.

They made an investment in future manufacturing for new airframes.


37 posted on 08/22/2016 12:36:31 PM PDT by AFreeBird (BEST. ELECTION. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

There is a whole row of the double size 380 gates at LAX. That most A380s I have ever seen in one place.


38 posted on 08/22/2016 12:38:10 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mears

I took the tour in 2003 (after 9/11) and there was little apparent security other than the fencing and security cameras). But lots in the background, I’m sure.


39 posted on 08/22/2016 12:39:08 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

Go to Frankfurt where you see Lufthansas A380s as well as A380s from Middle East airlines....surreal to see so many huge airplanes together.


40 posted on 08/22/2016 12:45:22 PM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson