I think there are too many liberal judges who will stop any serious investigation.
Yes.
Which is why the left is ‘all in’ on stopping Trump...no matter what the cost. Their freedom from prosecution depends on it.
I suspect all of the blanket presidential pardons will take care of that.
He has to. If he fails to destroy them they will destroy him. What’s more, if he fails to destroy them what has been the point? He does not need Air Force One.
True justice will mean war—this is way deeper than Clinton and Soros (tip of the iceberg). When other countries learn and can confirm just how much meddling has been done for the past 50+ years... well. It’s US against the world. JMHO
Rudy G
Purge anyone who can be purged.
I don’t think we have enough cells for all of them.
Maybe they could just give back all the money they stole or made by their lies or be incarcerated in those tent structures and Arpaio could be the warden.
Excellent point you raise. Recall the CIA agents Obama was going to hound but then dropped it once elected. I supported that because I then thought a new administration HAD to have a clean slate. Along the way I realized the uniparty depends on this slack cutting. It feeds endless corruption. Now I believe all new administration should settle old scores. Or, the corruption will never end. So, yes they can go forward and I say, sic ‘em.
There will be an epic number of pardons issues by Obama on his way out. If you aren’t pardoned on Jan 21st 2017 you are too small to procecute.
How many will there be? 5,000? 20,000?
You can bet on Hillary and Bill getting two of them.
The ridiculousness of their pouncing on every word Trump says to spin it negative and the pathetic weakness of their candidate will inform the answer to your question.
He will need to be Reagan-like and take his case directly to the American people.
He needs to explain it all in clear, concise language with flip charts if needed.
They may have a problem because of the source of the evidence and the lack of a chain of evidence custody. This may necessitate starting from scratch. There are other ways to build the case, but it may be more difficult than most would assume. Perhaps a Freeper with prosecution experience can weigh in?
You’re only half correct.
The reason for all of the disproportionate vitriol against Trump (and Us) is that the Uniparty is scared to death of an un-bought and un-purchasable candidate achieving ultimate power to rule over their world. People with both Ds and Rs next to their names will be looking at real jail time in the Trump Administration.
He needs to jail the Clintons and obama.
Trump may not be able to get rid of Federal Judges but I sure hope that as soon as he takes office he fires all the Federal attorneys put in place by 0.
Back when Reagan held office, in the first two years he fired 89 of them so President Trump wouldn’t be setting a precedent although the dims and their press would go apoplectic over it and demand hearings.
Wouldn’t count on it. I think politicos frequently use evidence like this for leverage rather than the “Gotcha” impact we hope for. In other words, some (thinking of a Rove type as an example) choose to use intel as a tool to force cooperation rather than to expose corruption.
why do you think the press is trying to destroy Trump before the debates have even happened?
The first order ob business will be to call it a political witch hunt.
Any more than Bubba’s impeachment was political. He was impeached for PURJURY, not because he got his knob polished by an intern.