Posted on 08/11/2016 9:07:57 AM PDT by heterosupremacist
And so?
I went to public schools. Never was abused or had sex with a teacher. The folks I knew who were Catholic were not a huge number but it was probably a third of the people I knew. One parish priest had a real thing for boys....’my boys’ he would call them. I know three of them who have had real challenges in life thanks to this turd
And your point is what?
Priests and pastors hold a special position In ones spiritual life
Tha majority of teacher abuse thnese days seems to be female teachers raping teen age boys.
Surely you don’t suggest teachers are the same as priests?
Surely you are not trying to diminish what has happened in the corrupt American Catholic clergy
Faulty argument anyway
My dislike of the Catholic Church came from watching them vote democrat no matter what
Does not matter how many facts you post; the anti-Catholic forces will swarm. Seems like the words “Catholic”, “pope”, or “priest” in a title set them off.
No it is not
Cite a source or slither away
HOMOSEXUAL rape is a better description yet. The abusers were HOMOSEXUALS. Violation of boys is part and parcel of the sodomite lifestyle.
OOOOOPS!
We're not supposed to say that, are we?
A left wing blogosphere Article by a self professed homosexual
Yeah sure thing that sure is solid sourcing
Much of what the article argues is correct. But the point the author misses is that, unlike many other religious denominations or other organizations, the Catholic Church is a world-wide hierarchical entity that had the ability (and incentive) to move offending priests from one place to another to avoid public scandal (and thereby endanger more children). There have been sex-abuse scandals at synagogues and Protestant churches, but most of them lacked the ability to cover things up by moving the offender to a different parish.
“Souls are at stake, not only of those abused, but of those who are witness to the evil.”
Exactly my point for many years. Yes there are pedophiles/homosexuals in many arenas of daily life. However, the leadership of the Catholic Church was aware of many of these evil people and allowed it to continue. Yes the pedophile/homosexual is guilty of his crime, but heinous of an individual do you have to be to knowingly allow this to continue. These are not Christians who fear judgment! These are fallen individuals with a cushy job.
All the apologetics miss the one sin that has put the church in the position that it’s in. They aggressively hid and covered up for the pedophiles. Priests were not slapped on the face on the church steps and driven away.
Had they done so, they wouldn’t be seen as they generally are now. They blew an amazing chance to show who they were. They sided with gay priests and hid them away, covering up what they did.
On the mark.
Re : Post #50
“They aggressively hid and covered up for the pedophiles. Priests were not slapped on the face on the church steps and driven away.”
That once was true. In our present day, Priests are removed; if only because of the threat of bankruptcy - BXVI also deserves credit for the changes instituted during his Papacy.
I see things stated as facts without the faintest shred of proof. What's the saying?
"You're entitled to your own opinions, but you're NOT entitled to your own facts."All of these opinions stated as facts without any sort of evidence lead me to dismiss the whole thing as not worth reading. I have to think that the author of this thinks that people must be pretty stupid if they going to accept what he says without challenging it, but wait, the majority of the country voted for the current turd in the white hut twice, so I guess his assessment of the average American as mighty dumb is spot on.
Myth?
Since the Catholic Church is ‘other worldly’ in temperament; its focus has always been on salvation.
As its mantra has been, “Reject the sin yet embrace the sinner”; the Church has always had an unconscious tolerance for homosexuals.
Add to this, the 1967 decision of Vatican II to ease the character requirements for admission to the Seminary; in order to alleviate the shortage of Priests; and you have the present situation that has been playing our for more than 50 years.
The current Pontiff, a man of the left, makes the problem that much more difficult to contain and eradicate. Thank the Lord he’s 80 years old, not 48!!!
Probably a queer with a boyfriend priest.
That’s possible, certainly. My point is that I don’t give anything that comes out of PSU any credence anymore, based on my personal experience with the ‘institution’.
So, what your saying is that a Priest is less likely to sodomize a boy than the average population?
How do you explain that as a 50 year old man, I know four people who were sodomized before their 13th birthday, and they were all sodomized by different priests. Yet I know no other people in a pretty wide circle of friends that we sodomized by anyone.
Most of the things I may not know are irrelevant.
In the 1950s through the 70’s the Catholic parishes in New England knew these diddlers were out there and did little to stop them. It was a little homo club that started at the seminary and took root.
I know what I know. And your 17 things don’t come close to explaining why they covered up for these faggots. If we had hung the first one from the town square, the rest would have take note.
They are evil men and do not warrant forgiveness.
Most of the times the term pedophile, which deals with pre-pubescent is used incorrectly. They are homo predators.
I call bullshit on that one.
The two universes are so different in size that it’s not really practical to normalize them.
It should be the ratio of homo predators to the general population compared the ratio of homo pre it’s to the population of priests.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.