Posted on 08/08/2016 3:39:44 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
Now that Hillary (“Hitlery”) Rodham Clinton (HRC) has received the Democratic Party nomination for president, there is a strong likelihood that she will win the election in November and then be enthroned as president in January of 2017. I predict that she will waste no time in launching an onslaught of punitive new policies via executive orders, presidential memoranda, and policy directives promulgated through her cabinet and Federal agencies to eviscerate our Constitutional rights (most notably the 1st and 2nd Amendments). A key goal this campaign will be silencing dissent in the alternative press and the American blogosphere. Given HRC’s history in government “service”, her outlook on life, her socialist agenda, and her vindictiveness, I anticipate that any or all of the following measures will be undertaken by the HRC Administration:
(Excerpt) Read more at survivalblog.com ...
Note that this does NOT include any measures regarding firearms - that's a WHOLE other topic.
Before anyone complains, YES I know that this is a blog entry by a blogger, but it is directly on point concerning a key part of our Constitutional rights that is likely to be infringed upon very badly, and very quickly upon Hillary entering office. It is also intended to get some of the normal Republican voters who don't much care for Donald Trump off of the fence, and voting for him - because IMHO there is simply NO POSSIBLE WAY that a Trump Presidency could possibly even approach the awfulness of a 2nd Clinton Presidency.
Looking forward to everyone's comments.
If she was a madame, I wouldn’t pay 3 bucks.
I’m already planning an escape if SWMNBP frauds her way into the White House.
(She Who Must Not Be President)
Drudge was told by a Supreme Court justice that this is already in the works, and this was stated in an interview almost a year ago.
I couldn’t agree with you, or Jim Robinson, more.
I’m voting for Trump - and I’ve been enthusiastically in his corner since last summer. It is time that others get there, as well, people who are now on the fence or #NeverTrump. We have a binary choice, and staying home or voting for anyone else besides Trump is (at best) a wasted vote.
I brought the issue of our 1st Amendment rights to the fore, so that maybe a few of these folks will wake up. We all have to do whatever we can to persuade even a few people - the future of this country depends on ALL of us doing this.
False premise. She will not be President.
http://oi68.tinypic.com/9lkikw.jpg
“If she isn’t there, and your with her, where are you?”....love it!!!
Second it.
If James Wesley, Rawles is saying Hillary’s gonna win...I’m feeling kind of sick.
https://www.amazon.com/Hillarys-Secret-War-Conspiracy-Journalists/dp/1595552251
Read this book. It was written back during the Clinton era. She was very early to understand what the internet would do and moved HARD to try to restrict internet journalism after the Lewinski story. The story had been successfully killed in the mainstream media and only broke when interknit journalists got it.
The book is dated in a sense, but you will find no better primer on her malevolent mentality.
She can only win via massive voter fraud.
There are solutions, even in the worst case scenario.
Locate to foreign servers in countries with minimal US influence. This could become a huge business. I could see Putin giving people a hand, if only to put a stick in Hellary’s craw. If it’s not practical to find such a location, next best would be ghost-writing for a friendly site outside of the U.S. with enough plausible deniability to keep it away from your public persona.
Make Tor and VPN your friends!
Make e-zines, memes and podcasts and torrent them rather than host them in a fixed location.
Re-learn the concept of the “dead drop”.
Please understand.
This isn’t, nor will it ever be Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s USSR.
Both 0bama and God forbid a Hillary presidency have a huge problem with the Alt-Media. A problem if their desire is to shut down dissenting views. They can and seem to have been able to get Google, YouTube, Twitter, Yahoo, FaceBook and others to filter out dissenting views.
So what do you do to suppress the balance of dissension?
You marginalize them.
You call them “Right-wing”.
You get the MSM and Hollywood to paint them as “outside” of “normal” thinking.
You use Political Correctness as a tool/weapon to expose those that step out of line.
Political Correctness is being used to destroy peoples lives and their livelihoods.
The MSM, Hollywood and most of our large public companies have succumbed to the fear of not being PC.
All of our Government and a majority of our private institutions have succumbed to the new thought police.
They fear not for their lives as in Stalin’s USSR, but for their livelihood.
Stalin had his secret police that went around and literally killed his opponents and the rest got the message.
Today we have a Liberal PC Stasi that works from the bottom up and is supported from the top down to destroy all opposition.
I got a gun and I’m ready to shoot anybody that threatens my rights but I don’t have anybody to shoot.
In that case, a bit of 4GW psy-ops is required, but it takes time and dedication. If a situation could be arranged that SJWs could be induced to turn on each other and by that way, implode, it could achieve results with far less risk and cost.
And while we`re on the subject of risk and cost, here’s an observation, especially for the benefit of the left-lurkers, NWO trolls paid and otherwise, and media and academia lackeys. Suppressing or marginalizing the law-abiding opposition only leaves a vacuum for successors who will not be so peaceful, scrupulous or law-abiding. I DO NOT EVER want to see that happen, because nothing is dirtier than a civil war that goes hot, and it will end in blood and tears for all around. Just ask the Yugoslavians - I mean, Serbians, Bosnians, Croations, Montenegrans, Macedonians, etc...
Look up the archives of Selco at http://shtfschool.com/ for an account of what happened when it all went down there. Not a plug for that site, but quite interesting (if sobering) reading.
Come on now, he's a survivalist/prepper/fictionalist. IOW, doomsday scenarios are his stock-in-trade. Doesn't mean he's correct, just that he has in inclination towards discussing worst cases.
And WTF is up with that comma in his name?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
