Posted on 08/02/2016 11:20:15 AM PDT by Jaguarmike
We hold debates at colleges, in front of students. Why not have a debate in front of soldiers?
Fort Hood, as we all know, was the scene of a terroriss attack...or as Obama calls it...workplace violence.
It's rich that a pal of Bill Ayers - Barrack Obama-- says Donald Trump is not fit to be a Commander In Chief. Let's see what the troops think.
Great suggestion.
Partisan activities on military bases are not allowed.
Democrats only like the military when they can be cast as victims or used to attack anything good about America. This is the case with Khan.
It’s not partisan. It’s not a Trump rally, or a Clinton one. It’s a part of the democratic process.
It’s not partisan if both sides are there. And you might want to realize that the presidency runs the military.
And Andrews AFB has been the site of tons of partisan activity.
You said you want to hear what the troops think. They are not permitted, while in their official capacity, from endorsing candidates. They could be spectators at a rally or debate, but are not allowed to cheer, boo, etc.
Ok. Then let’s hold it in front of the VFW.
Hillary is busy that day.
Damn good idea. Focus put on military vote fraud as added dimension.
Trump should ask her in the debate, do you agree with Obama that it was workplace violence or was it a terrorist attack that could have been prevented.
Is there a suitable venue -auditorium, theater, etc., somewhere in Killeen, just outside of the gates?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.