Posted on 07/29/2016 11:07:20 AM PDT by Morgana
Actress Ashley Judd spoke during the Democratic National Convention this week about protecting the rights of sexual assault survivors like herself. Unfortunately, Judd also gave a passionate plea for legalized abortion on demand.
The actress spoke during an event hosted by NARAL, a radical pro-abortion group that supports abortion, not just in the rare cases, but for any reason up until birth. Earlier in the week, NARAL president Ilyse Hogue proudly bragged about her abortion at the DNC as the crowd cheered.
New York Magazine reports Judd told the NARAL “Men for Choice” crowd about how she became pregnant after she was raped. She said she made the “excruciating decision” to have an abortion, and now she is glad she did.
“If abortion had not been safe and legal at that time, I would have been forced to carry to term and deliver a child that was conceived in rape,” Judd said.
The report continues:
“We are a great country, and rapists have paternity rights in 22 states, including the state in which I was raped and the state which my rapist is from,” Judd went on. In many of those states, parental rights can’t be terminated unless the attacker is convicted of sexual assault, which as we’ve seen lately is not always easy to achieve, even in the cases when women report their rapes, which in the majority of cases they do not.
It’s protecting her right to decide what to do with her body, Judd says of why she’s with Hillary Clinton, because she can’t imagine a world in which the law would have required her to make a different choice than she did. “I am very grateful to NARAL and Men for Choice for allowing me the dignity to make that excruciating decision for myself.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com“
Sexual assault is horrible, and survivors like Judd deserve the best care and support that society can provide. But, as is the case with Judd, sometimes rape results in the creation of a second victim – a child. That child, who did nothing wrong, also deserves care and support, not death.
Many pro-lifers do agree with Judd on one thing: It should be easier to terminate rapists’ parental rights. Women can be driven to abortion by the fear that having their child will force them to maintain contact with their abuser.
Analyn Megison, a board member of of Hope After Rape Conception, had to fight her rapist for custody of her daughter.
“My custody case in Florida against my rapist started in 2010 and went on for a little over two years. Though I had a restraining order and had pursued prosecution, he was not convicted of rape,” Megison said. “At the time he sued for custody, I did not know how many states had no or limited legal protection at that time from a rapist biological father when the child was conceived from his attack. Those states which had laws required a rape conviction.”
To protect women from this trauma, a number of states have introduced legislation to make it easier to terminate the parental rights of a rapist. New Mexico is one.
In 2015, pro-life advocates also succeeded in advocating for a new federal law, the Rape Survivor Child Custody Act, to protect women in these situations. Rebecca Kiessling, who has been working to protect mothers across the country who decide against having an abortion after they were victimized, has helped pushed the legislation on a state level.
Kiessling told LifeNews in 2015 that the new law “provides an incentive to states to pass legislation providing for a means to terminate the parental rights of rapists, using the ‘clear and convincing evidence’ standard from the U.S Supreme Court case of Santosky v Kramer.”
Kiessling is urging pro-life advocates to get involved in the battle to protect mothers from rapists who seek custody of their children after the rape and abortion rejection.
“We encourage every pro-life organization to get behind this legislation, as Right to Life of Michigan is currently championing this bill. Not only is it pro-life in effect — because pregnant rape victims will be more likely to choose life if they know they’ll be protected from the rapist, but you’ll be able to demonstrate that you really care about these women and their children, and you’ll also have the advantage of seeing rape survivor mothers testifying before the legislature,” she explained.
Not only should a rapists parental rights be terminated, but so should the rapist. Forcible rape should be a capital offense.
She does know that boobs are for feeding babies right!?
That is why men are hard wired for Breasts and Butt, it shows good child bearing potential.
But the Dems fight mother nature at every turn, al la the Transgender nonsense.
Ashley Judd proving that beauty is only skin deep, but ugly’s to the bone.
“My custody case in Florida against my rapist started in 2010 and went on for a little over two years. Though I had a restraining order and had pursued prosecution, he was not convicted of rape,”
Kinda weird that the hildabama theme seemed to revolve around childrens rights and human rights and always working to protect and defend children. Mere tissue masses, meh, Not so much.
Another Hollywood clown keeping it classy............
They don’t want a choice. They are in love with abortion, their sacrament.
I saw a program about the Judds several years ago which told the true story of them.
They are basically fruitcakes and pretty sorry ones at that. Virtually everything about their public persona is false.
More proof that6 the demonic bastardship of the DNC has been successful in damning women to believe the alive unborn child is not a child. Evil eats the human race right into hells bottom.
Yeah - just like bank robbery. The best way to adjudicate that crime is to kill all the innocent bystanders.
Impregnated by rape. . .so she said. . .
The other Judds — the mother and Ashley's sister, Wynnona, are pro-life and outspoken about it. They may have personal problems of their own, but they are 100% opposed to killing the unborn.
The Ghosts of aborted Babies hide under your bed and wait
"Ms. Merkle had a turbulent two-year marriage to Michael Merkle between 2006 and 2008, during which she gave birth to their son.
In 2007, she repeatedly made claims that Mr. Merkle was abusing her daughter from a prior marriage and their infant son. Investigations did not confirm these serious allegations, but Ms. Merkle clearly continued to believe that she and her children were victims of abuse.
Although a precise date was not established at trial, Ms. Merkle left Florida with the children and settled in Maryland, assisted by an organization dedicated to protecting victims of violence. She did not inform her estranged husband of her whereabouts, but Ms. Merkle did register her new address with the Florida Attorney General through an address confidentiality program."
Her new name is Megison. I believe she is just as delusional as Judd is, regarding "retroactive" rape.
By the way, Ms. Megison also believes that the mere allegation of rape is sufficient to permanently deny any visitation rights of the father. Not a conviction, or even an arrest, mind you. Just the allegation.
Except that too often the “victim” lies about being raped.
That’s their evil meme.....that there isn’t a viable life until several months of gestation. Sick and disgusting.
I asked a lib relative if this means that they were ‘disposable’ at 1 - 12 weeks. They actually said yes :(
Pray.
Not everyone who is convicted of murder is sentenced to death, likewise not everyone convicted of rape should be sentenced to death either. But it should be an option.
A false accusation of rape should carry heavy consequences as well. Life in prison would not be out of limits.
Just as a rape can destroy a person’s life, their relationships, their mental state, their ability to trust and have normal contact with people, so too does a false accusation of rape.
Forcible rape is a hideous offense and should be treated as the same level of murder. Often, it has the same results in taking away a person’s life.
Those who forcibly rape women, and especially children, should face the possibility of death from the State. Those who falsely accuse someone of rape should face a life in prison.
Agreed. Before the death penalty is instituted there should be overwhelming evidence of forcible rape and not some chick who decides three weeks after having consensual sex that she MIGHT have been raped because she was somewhat drunk (but still conscious and agreeable) when it happened.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.