And your point is?
Cart before horse. She is disqualified following conviction.
Is this what convicted Sandy Berger? Wait, did they get Berger?
You think that LL is going to do anything about this?
And?
they need to put hillary on “Are You Dumber Than A Fourth Grader”. if she gets even one question wrong,,she needs to withdraw
Hillary granting access to her private server containing over a hundred highly classified emails to her LAWYERS WHO DON’T HAVE SECURITY CLEARANCES is perfectly okay with James Comey.
Why do you folks assume the law is important anymore? When all of the chief law enforcement officers of the nation are in collusion with the chief suspect and her indicted perjurer cohort-in-crime husband, to let her off the hook scot free without even so much as a traffic ticket, you know the fix was in long before this recent flurry of astonishing activity.
Translation: Hillary is a criminal but we are going to look the other way so she can become the first female, unindicted, criminal president.
It's embarrassing to have government officials in our own government that are more openly and blatantly corrupt than those in the so-called third world banana republics.
The US Constitution describes the only qualifications for the office of President: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
No law can change these requirements.
Obama was legally disqualified too.
DBCJR, the magazine seems to have gotten close, but cited the wrong law. Comey appears to have ignored the law, 18 USC 193 Subsection F, which applies to government officials and defense related documents. Comey admits that there were some classified documents found among those transmitted through Hillary’s server, and there is no intent required for her conviction. In fact “intent” is nowhere included in the law, rather like manslaughter does not require proof of intent. Having responsibility for sensitive and defense-related documents which are exposed, accidently or not, guarantees conviction of any official satisfying the criteria, criteria which Comey himself admits pertains to Hillary. Comey lied and counts on our ignorance, along with the complicity of people we assume to know the law like Trey Gowdy. Congress could and should impeach Comey. Hillary’s violation of 18 USC 793 makes her explicitly ineligible to hold government offices.
For a refreshingly clear explanation of the case by an experienced prosecutor, though one who doesn’t tolerate liars and fools, listen to “Deconstructing Comey and the FBI”, one of Krisanne Hall’s daily discussions of the law. Don’t be misled by the informal language, Krisanne was a formidable prosecutor, along with Russion Intelligence specialist and biochemist before taking on her public mission to teach the original intent of the Constitution to whomever is really interested. (She does say 18 USC 193, but probably misread her notes. She reads and correctly interprets 18 USC 793 (f)). Her reasoning is impeccable.
http://krisannehall.com/deconstructing-comey/