In most eyes here but not media and the odd hold out. So fair time on all sides is still technically viable, n'est pas?
2. No one else running has made as many or (to the media and others) so many big and in some cases over the top promises.(Hey I like alot of them myself).
Why make promises when you can manipulate delegates without the hassle of addressing real voters' concerns?
3. Why not Hillary or Bernie? Seriously? They're demonrats, the protected class
Why just apply this logic against Trump then and for the implied benefit to Cruz with no holding to the same standard to Democrats - the presumed possible opponents for a wild card Cruz nomination?
4. Why now? See number 1, since Trump is the presumptive nominee the liberal press can waste no time in attacking and attempting to marginalize him.
While presumption is practical, there are still the realities that certain other candidates will never cede genuine voter defeat. Then it is incumbent on us to at least consider the questions being asked of candidate Trump- -as- presumptive-nominee should also be applied to those engineering convention machinations against him.
So at least half your responses are cut’s at Cruz? I guess Trump can’t be the presumptive winner after all if Cruz still needs to be hacked at. Funny, I guess you saw my points in a different light, I didn’t try to cut at your chosen, just make valid points as I see them concerning Trump, but for some reason you felt the need to counter with comments about Cruz, people must worry about him alot.