Heidi Cruz: First Lady of the North American Union?

And that one mistake ( which he eventually voted AGAINST when it went for the vote ) TOTALLY INVALIDATES ALL THE OTHER VOTES HE DID?

His traitorous TPP "mistake" which aligns so neatly with the goals of his wife's globalist masters (the same suspects who floated him a fat loan which he failed to disclose) is far from his only problem, but it's certainly a big one. Who needs a leader whose main claim to fame is babbling in front of the Supreme Court, if that same corrupt babbler is willing to sell U.S. workers down the river?

UntrusTED.

RE: His traitorous TPP “mistake” which aligns so neatly with the goals of his wife’s globalist masters

Uh uh. If you looked at it carefully, Heidi Cruz was a term member for an INDEPENDENT task force sponsored by The Council of Foreign Relations.

As the Tempest Times reports — When you go to the local hardware store and set up an installation, the hardware store probably won’t be doing your installation. These companies hire outside installers to do the work, but take a percentage of the payment. This is how I would describe the Independent Task Force Mrs. Cruz took part in. She was hired to give a dissenting opinion of a plan to help strengthen the borders and increase economic stability between the countries within North America. That is exactly what she did.

If there is a “New World Order” agenda on the rise, it is reasonable to assume that a gun ban would be helpful.

Ted Cruz has always been at the forefront of DEFENDING the Second Amendment, from his time as Solicitor General of Texas to his time in the Senate.

RE: Who needs a leader whose main claim to fame is babbling in front of the Supreme Court, if that same corrupt babbler is willing to sell U.S. workers down the river?

What you call BABBLING is really DEFENDING our second amendment rights in the Supreme Court.

What few people know — and the media won’t remind them — is that Ted Cruz was a prime mover in getting District of Columbia v Heller, in which Scalia wrote the majority opinion, before the Court and decided in favor of gun rights, ruling that the right to keep and bear arms was an individual right and that the word “militia”, as the Founders intended, meant the “whole people” of the United States. If Heller had gone the other way, our gun rights would have been thrown on the ash heap of history.

THAT is his record. That alone already invalidates the idea that he is a globalist who will favor world organizations over the United States.

Theatrics and Prolefeed. Throw the chumps a bone. He's not the only politician who supports the 2nd Amendment -- even some democrats do. ("8 Surprisingly Pro-Gun Democrats" http://www.gunsandammo.com/second-amendment/8-surprisingly-pro-gun-democrats/.) Support for the 2nd Amendment is the absolute minimum conservatives should expect in return for their votes.

Ted has a history of trying to stick it to American workers. He supported a 500% increase in H-1B visas. Once exposed, he came up with a lame plan to "suspend the issuance of all H-1B visas for 180 days", after which it will be business as usual for Ted and his globalist buddies. He's not fooling many at this point.

UntrusTED.

That's quite a sales pitch...Some of us remember that the CFR for decades was a highly secret organization and their existence was denied by everyone in gov't and the media...

We all know Goldman Sachs is a huge promoter of open borders and cheap foreign labor since they represent big international business...

We also know they are a big supporter of the massive port in Mexico that is to replace the ports in California for unloading and distributing ship containers from Asia thus cutting off the American distribution of these containers...

That's why the super highway was built from these ports in Mexico up thru Texas...This will eliminate the thousands of jobs of port workers in America as well as the jobs of thousands upon thousands of American truck drivers...

Obviously 'security' is a non issue with the CFR since the southern border is open to foreign terrorists as well as the illegal drug traffic...

The problem with Cruz is we now see you can't trust much of what he says...

When asked about the Council at another event in Tyler, Tex., on Oct. 15 — Texas, home of Ron Paul and Alex Jones, is the sort of place this comes up a lot — Cruz called the organization “a pernicious nest of snakes” that is “working to undermine our sovereignty,” according to video provided by someone who opposes his candidacy.

So Cruz was against the CFR destroying and eliminating American sovereignty before he was for it, eh???

For those of us who have watched the CFR for years are not fooled by this propaganda piece nor Ted Cruz...

RE: We all know Goldman Sachs is a huge promoter of open borders and cheap foreign labor since they represent big international business...

There have been multiple articles regarding Heidi Cruz, her position at Goldman Sachs and her term membership on the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Not one of these articles gave any in-depth explanation – just unproven accusations and theories.

Let me repeat —— , Heidi Cruz was a term member for an INDEPENDENT (EMPHASIS) task force sponsored by The Council of Foreign Relations.

The Independent Task force was hired to give a dissenting opinion of a plan to help strengthen the borders and increase economic stability between the countries within North America. THIS IS WHAT SHE DID.

Heidi Cruz worked for Goldman Sachs ( as did I as an IT consultant ). SO WHAT? Is working for a firm now considered EVIL?

What was her role in Goldman anyway?

She served as regional head of the Houston office in the private wealth-management unit, which serves individuals and families who have on average more than $40 million with the firm.

So, she is a WEALTH MANAGER, THAT’s ALL. Unless you can show that she swindled the money of investors who asked Goldman to help manage their investments, all these talk about Goldman Sach’s support for open borders is UNRELATED to her job as wealth manager.

I worked for Goldman and do not support everything their CEO or partners support as a matter of national policy. Why should she be equated with what the partners do?

As for Ted Cruz, I want you to show me where in his RECORD as both Texas solicitor general or senator he favored

The TPA is not CONCLUSIVE evidence. Ted Cruz’s policy on trade has always been for MORE not less. However, Cruz specifically placed conditions on voting for it:

1) it must pursue nearly 150 specific negotiating objectives, like beefing up protections for U.S. intellectual property or eliminating kickbacks for government-owned firms

2) the administration must consult regularly with Congress and meet high transparency standards.

3) before anything becomes law, Congress gets the final say.

He wrote all of the above in an April 21, 2015, op-ed in The Wall Street Journal.

Now if you will remember, Following the Senate passage (which Cruz voted FOR), the bill went to the House where it was split into two separate votes: one on TPA and the other on Trade Adjustment Assistance, or TAA (a program that provides training support, career counseling, allowances, and wage supplements to workers affected by globalization and trade).

Cruz cast a “nay” vote.

The same day, Cruz published his op-ed in Breitbart, a conservative news site, attributing his change of heart on TPA to “two material changes” in the legislation.

First, he wrote, was the WikiLeaks reveal in June 2015 of the Trade in Services Agreement, or TiSA, which is intended to extend trade in services (as opposed to goods) to address changes and advances in technology since the last major services agreement was implemented in 1995. It is a key part of the trade agenda under negotiations; services include finance, insurance, transportation, telecommunications and other fields.

Cruz wrote: “Despite the administration’s public assurances that it was not negotiating on immigration, several chapters of the TiSA draft posted online explicitly contained potential changes in federal immigration law. TPA would cover TiSA, and therefore these changes would presumably be subject to fast-track.”

Second, he said, were supposed “secret deals between Republican leadership and Democrats.”

“After witnessing several senators huddle on the floor the day of the TPA vote (on June 23), I suspected that to get their votes on TPA, Republican leadership had promised supporters of the Export-Import Bank a vote to reauthorize the bank before it winds down,” he said.”I cannot vote for TPA unless McConnell and Boehner both commit publicly to allow Ex-Im to expire — and stay expired.” Congress debated the reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank prior to its expiration on June 30, 2015, and it was a topic of disagreement among GOP members.

THOSE ARE NOT THE ACTIONS OF A GLOBALIST WHO WOULD SUPPORT FOREIGN CONCERNS OVER AMERICA’s.

Let me repeat —— , Heidi Cruz was a term member for an INDEPENDENT (EMPHASIS) task force sponsored by The Council of Foreign Relations.

The Independent Task force was hired to give a dissenting opinion of a plan to help strengthen the borders and increase economic stability between the countries within North America. THIS IS WHAT SHE DID.

Heidi Cruz did not give any dissenting views on the new North America...She was in total agreement and helped implement the plan to remove our American sovereignty...

Here's the real scoop on the deal...And it's not pretty for Americans...And we can see why Cruz pushed serius immigration reform...With Cruz, there will be no wall, or fence...

Heidi Cruz worked for Goldman Sachs ( as did I as an IT consultant ). SO WHAT? Is working for a firm now considered EVIL?
What was her role in Goldman anyway?

Managing Director...

She served as regional head of the Houston office in the private wealth-management unit, which serves individuals and families who have on average more than $40 million with the firm.

So, she is a WEALTH MANAGER, THAT’s ALL. Unless you can show that she swindled the money of investors who asked Goldman to help manage their investments, all these talk about Goldman Sach’s support for open borders is UNRELATED to her job as wealth manager.

It certainly isn't...They go hand in hand...

I never said she swindled anyone...But someone at Goldman swindled investors out of billions...And she is right at the top of the heap...She directed multi millionaires to which international corporations they should invest their money to reap the maximum profits...And you can bet it wasn't the John Deere Corporation they were led to invest in...

The TPA is not CONCLUSIVE evidence. Ted Cruz’s policy on trade has always been for MORE not less. However, Cruz specifically placed conditions on voting for it:

Exactly...Cruz is for far more unfair trade than we have now...He is for trade that benefits Goldman Sachs and their investors...

Ted was 'all in' for TPP before he was against it...He stuck his finger in the air and said, 'whoops', I better reconsider my position'...Cruz wants to increase green cards for foreigners to the toon of a million new card holders which will put that many Americans out of work...He had to back off when he found out it didn't sit so well with so many of his constituents...

Cruz cast a “nay” vote. Isn't that what they all do...They vote for unacceptable bill and those who are vulnerable or running for President vote 'nay' knowing the bill is a done deal...Looks good tho don't it...

Cruz is as GOPe as they come...That's means globalist...His wife is even more so...