Posted on 03/14/2016 5:57:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
-- snip --
The General Election: If Trump is nominated, he beats Hillary. He creates a movement, a cultural buzz and novelty that overwhelms the doddering, ancient. Libfascist, pantsuited, pervert-enabling harpy. And then he proceeds to be a marginally less terrible president than she would have been.
Obama’s AG admits to US Senate last week they are trying to criminalize criticism of Climate Change and criticism of Muslims
Clinton AD will be glad to finish that work
Time of Kurt, and the rest of the scream whiners, to stop emoting and start thinking for once
Door # 1 terrible president
Door #2 marginally less terrible president
Choose!
If # 2 gets more votes , you’re still going to get #1 because ....
Let’s be clear, conservatives: During this race, Trump fans are our opponents. But always and forever, the leftist scumbags of Occupy, BLM, MoveOn and their leaders like Bill Ayers, are our enemies, and if it’s a choice between the two I’ll side with the team that at least doesn’t hate America every single time. No equivocation. No hesitation. No regrets
I respect this guy for getting this part exactly correct.
Trump is an asshole for pretending he isn’t at least partly responsible for the chaos/violence at his recent rallies. His denial makes him look totally foolish.
That said, it is liberals that are starting it - but just like on the football field, the refs always see the reaction and not the instigation.
Trump needs to step it up a bit. All he has to do now is act Presidential and he cruises to the nomination. Instead, he’s giving them more and more fodder to use against him.
It’s a lame shame that the GOP is so pitiful that THIS is what we’ve been able to nominate.
More UniParty agitprop.
“Trump is an asshole for pretending he isn’t at least partly responsible for the chaos/violence at his recent rallies. “
Trump can’t force people to act like animals.
I’d suggest you get off that leftist talking point unless you want to see whomever you support be subjected to the same thing.
Because you aren’t winning any brownie points with them by saying this type of stuff.
Sorry, I disagree whole heartedly. No one (including me) is accusing Trump of FORCING people to act like animals. But he is inflaming the situation. My 10 year old son was able to make the observation: “What do they expect when Trump tells people to punch him in the face”...
The job of the President of the United States is to RAISE the lowest common denominator not pander/sink to it. Since when do rational debate and common sense politeness become a “leftist talking point”?
I’m not trying to win brownie points or gain favor with anyone. I’m trying to nominate a winning candidate so I don’t have to look at that b^tch for 8 more years. And every single day of this campaign, they are all making it harder and harder to get that done. Because they’re babies.
Trump is an asshole for pretending he isn’t at least partly responsible for the chaos/violence at his recent rallies.
Yep, just like all those women in Germany and Sweden getting RAPED by MUSLIMS for daring to go out after dark, they deserved it.
wow. Quite a leap ace. Better go take your medicine.
You mean that you don’t think they are partly responsible for their own Violent Rapes after going outside after dark where Muslims Are at?
Are you that incapable of staying on topic? We’re talking about Trump inciting violence. Not the individual acts of lunatics going out and raping people. BUT...if you want to make the argument that those rapists are being INCITED by clerics etc... preaching jihad, then I would agree with you that the clerics are partially to blame for the rapes of innocent women. But they aren’t FORCING people to commit rape.
Sorry, I disagree whole heartedly. No one (including me) is accusing Trump of FORCING people to act like animals. But he is inflaming the situation.
Sorry, I disagree whole heartedly. No one (including me) is accusing German and Swedish Women of FORCING people to act like animals. But they are inflaming the situation by going outside after dark.
Show me the Difference in these two statements, these are YOUR WORDS.
Are you that incapable of staying on topic?
NO, I am incapable of having arguments or conversations based on EMOTIONS instead of Logic.
Right now, we clearly have an Imperial Presidency with the 0bama regime. His unconstitutional assumption of power recognizes few limits, as his hand-picked bureaucrats thumb their noses at Congress, the Courts, and the American people. With the choices being between Trump and Clinton as the successor regime to 0bama, I don’t see the Imperial Presidency changing in form in any way. Nothing about Trump’s background indicates that he has a sense of the Rule of Law, the separation of powers, or a concept of a limited government. As the chief executive of a closely held corporation, his life experience can be summed up in his best known phrase: “You’re fired.”
With Clinton, you will get a dyed-in-the-wool communist who is also a life-long criminal, for whom lying and murder to gain political power are not off-limits. She would be every bit as evil as Josif Stalin, and would probably recognize fewer constraints on her power than 0bama does now. Hilary Clinton’s Amerika would be totalitarian wasteland, where lip service is paid to individual rights by a media entertainment complex that acts as the propaganda organ of the state. But in reality, the American people will be treated as pieces of meat to be disposed of as the state sees fit. I certainly would not expect the GOP-e to offer much resistance to her agenda, as its now apparent that their collusion is essential to her gaining the White House.
So, for me there really isn’t a choice in terms of the authority either will assume. The form of the presidency will not change, but there will be a difference in substance. The difference is I believe Trump will do more of what I want done than Clinton will, and by a margin that isn’t even close. It does not bode well for people who love the Constitution, but it is necessary to save the country from going down the drain.
Therefore, I will vote for Trump, but will do so knowing full well what I am voting for.
Right.
“But they are inflaming the situation by going outside after dark.”
That’s a logical thought. Goodbye.
I am not a lefty and I agree that Trump is at least partially responsible for encouraging that behavior. Also, I don’t care about brownie points.
Previsely
+1
You’ve made my point eloquently. The only thing you didn’t really touch on was my question: Is this the best we can do???
And you do not understand the tactics of the commie left. The only reason Cruz gasnt faced this yet is because his crowds are smaller and the left is focused on trump
Don’t think it won’t happen to whomever the republican nominee is
This was a direct attacl on EVERYONE. To blame trump is flatly idiotic and plays right into the hands of the PC speech police
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.