Posted on 03/05/2016 5:54:56 PM PST by PJ-Comix
From the get go when the Kansas caucuses closed, we had DETAILED numbers being reported for the Republican candidates. HOWEVER, despite the fact that Bernie Sanders has been declared to be the winner of the Kansas caucuses, I have seen NO NUMBERS reported.
Does anybody have an answer for this? Or is this an example of the MSM cooperating with the Clinton campaign to slow down Bernie momentum for the evening? I don't often agree with the DUmmies but at their site they are loudly complaining about this and I think they are right this one time. I also seem to recall some vote reporting shenanigans from MA on Super Tuesday.
Democratic
0% Reporting
Delegates Allocated: 1/37
Delegates
H. Clinton 0.0% 0 1
B. Sanders 0.0% 0
Read more: http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president#ixzz425H98o4q
Bernie was never supposed to win and he knew this.
Hillary got schlonged.
That’s all we really need to know.
Completely different process. The GOP only had one caucus location per county...and all you did is walk in, mark a ballot, and leave. The rats have an actuall caucus...with numerous locations for everyone to meet and get counted.
I noticed this with Iowa, as well.
She’s trying to keep the low voter numbers from being reported unless then benefit her.
BTW, others are now noticing this as well. CBS news has DECLARED Sanders to be the winner in Kansas but noticeably missing are the NUMBERS. Others have noticed this as well including this comment from a reader there:
How come we aren't hearing any numbers? Because in this race it's not just 'winning the state' but the number of delegates, ie. by how much you won the state.
Kansas caucus
Results will be available soon
DEMOCRATIC
Mar 533 delegates
Clinton
Sanders
Dropped out: O’Malley
Source: AP Feedback
Bump
They just haven’t completed the coin tosses yet.
Wyandotte thought that the caucus was next weekend. Lawrence voted for Bernie. The rest of the counties couldn’t find enough Democrats to hold a caucus.
My suspicion is they wanted to wait until Louisiana polls closed before releasing the Sanders numbers. Since Hillary has already been declared winner in LA, I guess it is now SAFE to release the Kansas caucus numbers.
Sanders wins Kansas Democratic caucuses, state party says
Yeah, so WHERE are the NUMBERS????
It’s a mystery!
Until I am given a RATIONAL explanation I will believe the Democrats purposely SAT on the Kansas numbers until AFTER the Louisiana polls closed.
I would agree.
At end of night, Sanders wins two, Clinton wins one
With votes still being counted, Bernie Sanders has won the Democratic caucuses in Kansas and Nebraska and Hillary Clinton has won the Louisiana primary, CNN projects.
But though Clinton won one state to Sanders’ two, her victory is shaping up to be a more meaningful victory. Louisiana has 51 delegates up for grabs, almost the same as Kansas (33) and Nebraska (25) combined.
Plus, her margin of victory seems to be wider in Louisiana, giving her a bigger share of delegates.
DWS and therefore the DNC delayed caucus results until the polls closed in LA.
The Democrat fix is in for that poor Socialist shmuck Sanders.
If the Democrat caucus was open to the extent your neighbors were aware of the candidate you voted for, all the more interesting to see a Bernie win. Gonna be a lotta corpses around KS in the near future.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.