Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARMY PLANS TO HAVE LASER WEAPON BY 2023
Popular Science ^ | 29 Feb, 2016 | KELSEY D. ATHERTON

Posted on 03/01/2016 8:20:23 PM PST by MtnClimber

The Pentagon kills language. Housing the brain and central coordinating organs of the most advanced military the world has ever known, the Depart of Defense headquarters can take an announcement as exciting as "the U.S. Army is working on laser guns" and distill it to, in the words of Mary J. Miller, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for Research and Technology, "aligned to transition into a program of record in the fiscal 2023 timeframe." Make no mistake: bland phrasing aside, the Army is going to fund laser weapon development in the next decade.

The remarks came last week as part of testimony before House Armed Services Committee's Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, and the laser program mention isn't really an offensive weapon. The laser program will supplement "Indirect Fire Protection Capability," an awkward way to say "tools that shoot down drones, mortars, artillery, rockets, and missiles." The current program wants to do that with missiles. Israel's Iron Dome is a good example of a similar system, built to intercept cheap unguided rockets fired at cities. It's effective, at a price: a pair of interceptor missiles costs about $50,000, which is between 50 and 100 times the price of the simple rockets they're made to protect against.

Lasers could change the economics of shooting down missiles.

(Excerpt) Read more at popsci.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: laser

1 posted on 03/01/2016 8:20:24 PM PST by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I bet they also become offensive weapons too.


2 posted on 03/01/2016 8:21:08 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Why are we announcing this?


3 posted on 03/01/2016 8:23:07 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (My first choice is Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Obama wants to be fair to our enemies?


4 posted on 03/01/2016 8:24:51 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

Because we already fielded a laser weapon on a ship in the Persian Gulf. For all the caterwauling about the F-35, it will be the first fighter sized aircraft with a directed energy weapon. Its just a matter of time.


5 posted on 03/01/2016 8:36:20 PM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I wonder how they will work in rain, snow or through clouds.


6 posted on 03/01/2016 8:43:23 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

7 posted on 03/01/2016 9:23:00 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Dunno for sure, but there may be Geneva Convention stuff about laser offensive use against personnel. How that translates into shooting down something that may have a pilot, lawyer crap.


8 posted on 03/01/2016 9:30:34 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“I bet they also become offensive weapons too.”

That is the plan.

All of the Military Services have programs to develop laser weapons - for defensive and offensive operations. The same laser that can intercept a mortar round, can be directed against a vehicle, person or building.

The HMMWV mounted version that they are developing for the Marines for air defense on the move, has engaging ground targets as one of its requirements.

Special Operations is pushing for early deployment on their AC-130 gunships, for ground attack. The laser that already deployed aboard the USS Ponce in the Gulf, can be directed against targets in the air, on the sea or on land. At 30 KiloWatts, it can burn holes in metal in a few seconds.

The power keeps going up, while the size and weight keep dropping. They are now looking to mount 30-50 KW on HMMWVs, and 100-300 KW on ships and planes.

They will be great offensive weapons, because you can power them from the engines, and keep firing as much as you can dissipate the heat, to keep from melting your weapons.


9 posted on 03/01/2016 9:38:09 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Oh, and they are invisible!

Things just seem to start burning, dying and blowing up.


10 posted on 03/01/2016 9:42:34 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Laser Weapon System (LaWS) aboard the USS Ponce:


11 posted on 03/01/2016 9:46:29 PM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“ARMY PLANS TO HAVE LASER WEAPON BY 2023”

Actually:

“ARMY PLANS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY HAVE LASER WEAPONS BY 2023”


12 posted on 03/01/2016 10:02:21 PM PST by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Thanks


13 posted on 03/01/2016 10:47:58 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (My first choice is Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No good if Red China takes us out before then.

When you’ve got 1.5 Billion people, you can lose a few hundred million and never miss them.

Lessons Learned: Be prepared NOW!


14 posted on 03/01/2016 11:10:31 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Sheldon built one when he was 10.


15 posted on 03/02/2016 3:28:58 AM PST by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

16 posted on 03/02/2016 6:15:05 AM PST by JRios1968 (I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
When you’ve got 1.5 Billion people, you can lose a few hundred million and never miss them.,P> Never remember now where I read it, but IIRC, read that China was the only country that could actually come out of nuclear war on the plus side after thinning out the unmanageable herd they have.
17 posted on 03/02/2016 9:02:14 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

There was a similar line in the movie “Red Dawn” when the downed American pilot Boothes Powers told the guerrilla warfare army of US kids that the U.S. had been joined by the 600 Million people of Red China in the fight against the Russians/Cubans, etc.

At least one earthquake thinned the herd a little when it literally wiped out the oil-city of Tanjou or something like that about 15 years ago. Unfortunately these were probably good, non Party people.


18 posted on 03/03/2016 3:56:09 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson