Posted on 12/27/2015 6:31:46 AM PST by rktman
The often ostentatious Donald Trump irritates Democrats, the liberal media, and the establishment Republicans for many reasons. They cannot understand how his popularity soars in the polls no matter what he says and what they do to unseat him, or what dirt, real or imagined, they try to dig up.
Donald Trump is a populist and a nationalist. He loves his country and does not like the path that the current administration and its supporters on both sides of the aisle have chosen for 320 million Americans, even though at least half have vociferously expressed their desires, to seemingly deaf elected representatives and senators, to maintain our sovereignty, our Christian roots, our market-based economy, our traditions, and our exceptionalism.
Donald Trump is a successful alpha male, which Hispanic populations, with their cultural machismo, greatly respect. He is a billionaire who has experienced success and failure, yet has come back unscathed like a Phoenix bird from the ashes of bankruptcies, divorces, law suits, and other life-altering events. He is wise and knows how to manipulate and keep his enemies closer. He is brash and doubles down on his opinions which later turn out to be based on fact. He comes back with evidence to support his opinions.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
The US has become progressively more and more a democracy and less of a republic. Trump will restore the republic and reimpose the limited democracy our Founding Fathers intended us to have.
Trump appeals to my sense of rules. Rules that were firmly implanted by age 12.
It’s not rocket science.
America wants the ruling elites in orange jumpsuits. Trump is a step in the right direction.
Trump is better than any possible Democratic alternative and seems to be someone the undecided can go for. Maybe Cruz is, but the rest of the field is more Dole, McCain and Romney types. No charisma,
Boy do she and they have this wrong from the beginning. It isn't "no matter what he says" and no matter "what they [GoPe} do. His popularity soars exactly because of what he says, and their demise is exactly because of what they do and don't do.
Government has become nothing but a protection racket run by the grifters in chief (Obama and the Clintons) with the connivance of their made men and stooges in chief, GoPe. Yeah, the muscle [the political class and their freinds and cronies] has to be paid off, and paid off well, but in a good protection racket at least the neighborhoods are safe, and the small time cheats are kept under control. We don't even get that.
I am a free market capitalist, small government constitutionalist, but boy Saunders looks good against that crowd.
Go Donald! Stop Omuslims Muslim jihadist innvaders. And build thar wall!
Trump will strip the Social Justice Warriors of their state power, allowing people to finally have the ability to effectively confront these pukes in the public arena without fear of losing their jobs or being targets of internet mobs.
Trump = French Revolution.
Cruz = American Revolution.
Choose wisely.
I have concluded this recently. What Republicans need now is a successful alpha male. Someone strong and principled who will not back down to the Rats, the MSM, to political correctness demands, or to the GOPe. When I look at the field of possible candidates, I only see 2 men; Trump and Cruz. Heck, Carly is more of an alpha male than the remainder of candidates. I like Carson, but I don't think he is strong enough - although he would be a great choice for a cabinet position. Certainly, the GOPe favorites tend to only be “strong” when it comes to folding.
Sadly, the gopE doesn’t see it that way. Another pander bear is just fine with them. No boat rocking allowed. As for Dr. Carson, his focus is medicine, not enough of a wide range of experience for me.
Even us college types will vote for Trump solely because the media (including Fox) and the GOPe hate him. His enemy’s are our enemies. His very existence proves that we don’t need either the GOPe or the media to win.
The “he can’t win” argument is as old as Reagan’s time, probably older. They used it against Reagan. Even Hillary used it against Obama. But its rarely true that a milk toast candidate can win over a domineering one, unless the domineering has a huge scandal.
What we have hear is a successful alpha male
The question is not “Is Trump good for America?” but “What is turning people to Trump?”
The German ruling class so discredited itself that the German people turned to ever more radical parties like the Sparticists (Communists) and Nationalists (eventually the NSDAP - Nazis). We are developing same situation here. The Federal Government, and elected and appointed officials within it have forfeited the trust and confidence of the American people, paving the way for candidates like Trump.
Great article, thank you.
Thanks. Apparently it’s a matter of perspective. I like Dr. Paugh’s stuff for the most part. It appears that it was good enough that Sean_Anthony just posted it again.
“The German ruling class so discredited itself that the German people turned to ever more radical parties like the Sparticists (Communists) and Nationalists (eventually the NSDAP - Nazis). We are developing same situation here. The Federal Government, and elected and appointed officials within it have forfeited the trust and confidence of the American people, paving the way for candidates like Trump.”
You could say the same think about the American Revolution and the British elite and the bumpkins in the Colonies. I get what you are saying though, every revolution or upheaval has its risks. I don’t want the U.S. going the way of Argentina or heaven forbid, the French Revolution.
That is a really stupid analogy! The correct one is:
Bush/Obama/Clinton = French Revolution
Trump/Cruz = American Revolution
In case you haven’t noticed, the rule of law has been under continuous and sustained attack since the Clinton Administration.
Notice: I said the analogy was stupid, you are probably a nice person. ;-)
I’d like to think he will prevent the parasites from destroying America. From islamos to Dindus pinching off their offspring evil.
I think the American Revolution was a very different case. It was not so much that Parliament and the King were discredited as that they were denying the colonists ‘the rights of Englishmen” to which they thought they were due. Home rule or seats in Parliament could have fixed things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.