[Shadowstrike]

How is truth now nastiness?
Consider this, Blackirish was maybe using spiritual discernment, which is not being judgemental, but is in FACT allowed by the Bible.

It is TRUTH that Bristol was supposed to be teaching by example that having a baby out of wedlock was not a good idea (note I did NOT say that having the baby was a BAD idea), and yet she got pregnant AGAIN out of wedlock.

Children are a blessing, but it is better for them to have married parents.

[House Atreides]

How is truth now nastiness?
****************************************

Sorry, I recognize intentional nastiness and cruelty when I see it. IMHO, it would not be unexpected (to me anyhow) that Bristol will be a fine mother to her children. And (now it’s MY time to be judgemental) if I were a child I’d sure as hell rather be raised by Bristol than by some of the NASTY, JUDGEMENTAL folks GLEEFULLY taking the opportunity to cast the first stone at Bristol. I wouldn’t want those folks in my life for one minute.

[TXBlair]

Give it up, Shadowstrike; logic will get you nowhere. After reading through this thread I can only surmise that we are only allowed to criticize young women who've had multiple kids by multiple men out of wedlock when their names are Shaniqua and LaTrina. When their names are Bristol, and we know and love their mothers, we are hateful if we comment. Never mind that the Shaniquas of the world may never have been taught better, are in keeping with their cultural norms and may have even have entered into the world in the very same way themselves; only they should be trashed on this forum when they fall short of God's standards. Free passes for those who grew up knowing better!!

I certainly hope to see Bristol's staunchest supporters here defending Shaniqua and LaTrina on future threads and celebrating their next rounds of out-of-wedlock babies.