Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Iowa to Fire Guns For Hawkeye Pep Rally
WHO tv ^ | December 23, 2015 | Roger Riley

Posted on 12/24/2015 6:47:59 PM PST by iowamark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: wally_bert

interesting training video here:

http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675060014_16-inch-50-caliber-Mark-7-gun_Iowa-class-battleship_structure-and-working-of-gun


21 posted on 12/24/2015 8:00:32 PM PST by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Not likely.

I’ve walked the deck of the Missouri and noted the electrical cable from the wheelhouse down to the boiler room ladder.
All would need to be stripped out. It’s over 55 year old and full of sea salt.

16 inch guns are primitive and slow to reload. Missiles would carry the day against an “Iowa.”

Then, there’s the radar signature of these BBs. Can’t very well hide em from today’s satellites.

Anyway, Go Hawks !


22 posted on 12/24/2015 8:05:20 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Beat you by 16 seconds


23 posted on 12/24/2015 8:06:27 PM PST by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
You can see a 16 inch barrel at Battery Townsley in Marin County, CA:

On October 1, 2012, a 16-inch naval gun was transported to Fort Cronkhite for display at Battery Townsley. The giant weapon, 68 feet long and weighing 120 tons, was once on the battleship USS Missouri and is identical in size and caliber to the ones that protected the bay during World War II.

You can find Battery Townsley on the Hill 88 hike in the Marin Headlands.

Yes, this really is in California!

24 posted on 12/24/2015 8:18:37 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

There were some barrels used for the HARP testing in the late 60’s or 70’s.


25 posted on 12/24/2015 8:19:07 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (Obamacare...... Because grandma is shovel ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

The back blast from one of the 16’s would blow everyone on the deck overboard.


26 posted on 12/24/2015 8:28:58 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

There is no back last with a 16” gun. Shock waves and concussion are more than enough to cause serious bodily or death.


27 posted on 12/24/2015 8:38:44 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: iowamark; MeganC
Very, VERY Cool!


28 posted on 12/24/2015 8:56:02 PM PST by KC_Lion (The fences are going up all over Europe. We shall not see them down again in our lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

Notice what looks like the bow of the ship shifted left from the blast.


29 posted on 12/24/2015 9:21:10 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

my dad was on the iowa in korea. 5 in gunner.


30 posted on 12/24/2015 10:06:09 PM PST by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Cool


31 posted on 12/24/2015 10:13:17 PM PST by CPT Clay (Hillary: Julius and Ethal Rosenberg were electrocuted for selling classified info.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Go Stanford!


32 posted on 12/24/2015 10:30:30 PM PST by goldbux (CDO / I may have Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, but at least I put the letters in correct sequence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I was offered a ticket last night, but decided not to go due to last minute travel costs and availability (and besides, the one game I did make it to this year didn’t work out too well), but this is just about enough to change my mind. Let’s hope the running game can get it going, sure missed that in Indy.


33 posted on 12/24/2015 10:39:15 PM PST by Darth Reardon (Is it any wonder I'm not the president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

Keep in mind that they’re not firing “real” 5” ordinance

They’re either using blanks - empty shell casings loaded with black powder or some other explosive (the shell casings are saved and reloaded) or the guns have been converted to mimick firing using pneumatics. This is how the Fletcher-class Destroyer “Kidd” in Baton Rouge LA “fires” her guns.


34 posted on 12/24/2015 10:47:33 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I’ve seen that piece of Yamato armor numerous times. It wasn’t struck by 16” Superheavy AP fired from a 50 caliber Iowa class rifle, it was struck by a standard 16” AP fired from a 45 caliber Washington/South Dakota class rifle.

The important thing in looking at the damage to that plate isn’t the full penetration — it’s the massive spalling and cracking around the penetration. Turns out Yamato-type armor was pretty brittle and the plate was shattered by the hit.


35 posted on 12/24/2015 10:55:52 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

One more point about that Yamato plate: not that it was hit by a straight on shot.

The Yamatos, like other contemporary battleships, had their armor mounted at a downward-facing angle to increase protection. That test shot, in other words, was rigged - it never would have happened in a real battle hit.


36 posted on 12/24/2015 11:01:42 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

Salutes to your Dad. That war damn sure isn’t “forgotten”.


37 posted on 12/25/2015 12:28:51 AM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

“16 inch guns are primitive and slow to reload. Missiles would carry the day against an “Iowa.””

Nope. The Iowa’s have missile defense in the form of screening DD’s with standard missiles specifically for that, and the Iowa’s also have CIWS.

Then, for the rare missile that makes it through, one final surprise. Modern anti-ship missiles are designed to attack modern warships that are essentially unarmored. They have splinterproof Kevlar armor in spots. A modern missile has no ability to defeat 12 inches of the steel armor from WWII.
This armor is not just a flat plate, in a BB it is sloped, and built in depth with critical areas of the ship getting even more special treatment.

A modern antiship missile carries a 500 pound charge, and impacts often with less speed than an old AP battleship shell. And it isn’t a hardened penetrator. So of the very few that get through, 90% of modern antiship missiles will leave scorches and little damage.

Modern ships can be penetrated by a warthog all day long. An Iowa ain’t the Sheffield or a pissant modern cruiser. For extra fun, no surface combatant has an effective way to attack a battleship, and had better stay at least 20 miles away.


38 posted on 12/25/2015 12:42:48 AM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Back in the 50s or 60s I’ve heard they used a bunch of these and other old large caliber barrels to dispose of high level radioactive waste.


39 posted on 12/25/2015 12:42:51 AM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BerryDingle

thx


40 posted on 12/25/2015 12:54:22 AM PST by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson