Posted on 10/25/2015 9:21:05 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda
Also, they tend to count Hispanics, many of whom are non-white, as white. The real number of innocent blacks murdered by non-Hispanic whites is probably much lower than the official total of blacks murdered/killed by whites. I'll bet less than fifty annually.
But, like everything else, it's almost impossible to get the truth from lib sources,
Thanks for the personal anecdote. So cops are gunning down dozens of innocent citizens on a daily basis, huh? Why am I not hearing more stories about that?
Not dozens daily, but they are out to VICTIMIZE the public and steal more from citizens via bogus tickets and quotas than the goddamned criminals do.
NYPD beats and kills lots of people just for kicks, reason your’re not hearing about it because the NYPD lies and are experts at the cover up.
Black scumbags have been gunning down NYPD since I was a kid, there is nothing new here.
The NYPD has a problem because the effin mayor is a goddamned Sandinista and has declared open season on them.
The NYPD can take care of itself and will, and that means they will be dropping many suckers.
You ever live in NYC?
Yes, I’m sure all the thousands of cops in NYC are all vicious thugs. Have a nice day.
Did 4 NYPD detectives gun down an unarmed man or not? Yes - No
Did the City agree to a $3,000,000 payoff to the deceased family? Yes - No
Did the 4 cops who killed that guy ever face any serious consequences? Yes - No.
Probably very few of them are, BUT the rest cover up the actions of those who are. Making them equally guilty.
No, I pointed out a source that has been long discredited due to itself and its openly left-wing stances. That does not make me hypocritical, but the defense of such sources makes you look like a liberal. With all due respect. Just as your ad hominems also make you look liberal. Never mind Wikipedia’s extremely heavy reliance on that particular source in the link thereof.
If your only criterion is “unarmed man”, then Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown et al share Diallo’s status, according to that logic.
Did 4 NYPD detectives gun down an unarmed man or not? Yes - No
Did the City agree to a $3,000,000 payoff to the deceased family? Yes - No
Did the 4 cops who killed that guy ever face any serious consequences? Yes - No.
Relevance of questions? None of the answers support your conspiracy theories about the NYPD.
Incidentally, the police officers were acquitted by jury, not judge. And Albany is not a non-diverse locale, not even back then.
How about some other questions, as to why did Diallo flee and why did he pull anything out of his pocket?
Did 4 NYPD detectives gun down an unarmed man or not? Yes - No
Did the City agree to a $3,000,000 payoff to the deceased family? Yes - No
Did the 4 cops who killed that guy ever face any serious consequences? Yes - No.
Why? We all know the answers to the affirmative. So answer the question: Relevance?
I make it a policy not to argue with drunks, creationists, and liberals because they can only hold one idea in their minds. I’ll have to add another category of people not to waste time on. Those who worship police and government power (oh wait - those are LIBERALS)
OK, don’t answer as to what the relevance is.
And that would be a false dilemma, between anarchy and statism. The Declaration of Independence makes that clear.
BTW, to be anti-”creationist” (which is a liberal epithet) is to be a liberal. Thanks for being candid.
Just to clarify: The word “creationist” is an epithet created by liberals to attack conservatives. And used by liberals too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.