Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Email Scandal: 3 Questions That Demand Answers Before Hillary Can 'Put It Behind Her'
Investor's Business Daily ^ | 10/14/2015 | Staff

Posted on 10/15/2015 5:13:51 AM PDT by RockyTCB

Integrity: Hillary Clinton and the mainstream press may be thrilled that Bernie Sanders gave her a free pass on her email scandal at the Democratic debate. But that does nothing to mitigate the serious issues it raises.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: email; hillary; hillaryclinton; singlelineposter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2015 5:13:52 AM PDT by RockyTCB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

Watching the debate and the aftermath of the debate, I really think Cankles, the PIAPS will be the next President of the United States. If she is not in jail and we all know Clintons do not go to jail.


2 posted on 10/15/2015 5:24:24 AM PDT by Tupelo (Honest men may go to Washington, but Honest men do not stay in Wahington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

Moving Classified data and removing the TS markings is only done intentionally and its a FELONY.

Nobody would do that without orders from Hillary.

This is not “poor judgement”.

This is CRIMINAL INTENT.


3 posted on 10/15/2015 5:30:02 AM PDT by G Larry (Vote Hillary! Pro-Abortion Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

The only way Satan’s daughter will put the emails (and her other treasonous crimes) behind her is when, following her trial and conviction, she fall through that trapdoor on the gallows.


4 posted on 10/15/2015 5:30:11 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

The federal government can find something to indict anyone. I think we have to assume Hillary is being blackmailed by BO on this, or will be. Think what BO could get out of that.


5 posted on 10/15/2015 5:35:24 AM PDT by Gratia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

“The fact that she ignored the blatantly obvious national security implications calls into serious doubt her ability to put the nation’s interests above her own.”


6 posted on 10/15/2015 5:38:23 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Even writing a summary of classified information (as I suspect Abedin and maybe another flunky or two at State did) and sending the summary through non secure channels is criminal.

Shrillary saw just the summaries and that’s how she can claim she never sent or received anything “marked” classified. It’s the typical Clinton weasel speech.


7 posted on 10/15/2015 5:39:29 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

America is under judgement. That’s why we have Hussein. That’s why we’ll have the she-devil. If we survive Hussein.


8 posted on 10/15/2015 5:39:43 AM PDT by Old Yeller (Obama's Iran nuclear deal - The Devil is in the details.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

The very existence of the server itself was a violation of law that demands jail time.


9 posted on 10/15/2015 5:48:13 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

http://freerepublic.com/tag/by:rockytcb/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change

Also, welcome to FR.
Do you ever post responses, discuss anything?


10 posted on 10/15/2015 5:48:53 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

I’m not yet convinced Ubershrew will be the next President, though I believe the election is hers to lose.

Once thing is absolutely for certain, though... she will not be prosecuted... ever.


11 posted on 10/15/2015 5:49:25 AM PDT by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB; Old Sarge; humblegunner; Larry Lucido; Darksheare; 50mm

Welcome to FreeRepublic.

I noticed that since your recent sign up, you have posted eight threads that have generated close to 300 responses.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:rockytcb/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change

Despite all that interest in your posts (which BTW have all come from the same source) you have yet to respond to any of the comments on your threads.

Those of us who support FreeRepublic value this Forum as a place for the active interchange of ideas and information, not just a place for hit-and-run pimping or craven self-promotion.

At the bottom left of this post, you’ll see an active button that’s labeled “Post Reply.” Go ahead and hit it. Then you can tell me how I’ve got it all wrong, and you really want to be a constructive member here and not just a posting bot.


12 posted on 10/15/2015 5:50:53 AM PDT by shibumi (A concrete fascination scraping the edge of nothing This is Black Sunshine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB
Hillary dismisses the entire email scandal by saying it was "not the best choice," as though she were talking about a wine pairing.
I can only imagine Donald Trump - who after all runs a pricey club in Palm Beach - making a comparison like that!!

Hillary and The Donald have each now responded to a question by challenging the legitimacy of the question. Trump objected about a question about something he had said, improvisationally, in the most public way possible during an entertainment TV show. Hillary objected to a question touching ethics, prudence, and national security - a question about a matter which Hillary tried, unsuccessfully and illegally, to keep secret from the public.

'The American people," Sanders said after Hillary tried to explain away her email problems, "are sick and tired of hearing about your damn emails." Not only did the partisan audience erupt in cheers; so did reporters covering it.

"The entire press room just exploded when Bernie said that about Hillary's emails," one tweeted.

No claque of Hillary supporters - even one which includes journalists as a class - can make her clandestine insecure email operation equivalent to an arguably boorish public comment by a live TV performer.

13 posted on 10/15/2015 5:50:58 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

Question for Hillary:

“In your position as Secretary of State, you apparently never used secure government e-mail. In light of the fact that not all of the e-mails have been revealed, the security agencies must necessarily assume that valuable national security information has been compromised.

“What, as President would you recommend they do, if your Secretary of State does the same thing? Would it not then be prudent to assume that key agents, important national security plans, classified information, and location and names of key assets have been compromised, and that the entire security apparatus of the United States must be altered, changed, dismantled, and/or rebuilt?”


14 posted on 10/15/2015 6:00:10 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Actually, Hillary is not capable of cutting and pasting traffic from one machine (SCI) to another machine (Unclass). I’d be willing to wager $10k that she can’t accomplish that...even if you gave her twenty-four hours to just cut and paste one single line.

So, you start to look this over. A number of support staff people simply got verbal comments from Hillary over some phone to send her words about something going on....and they (not her) did the cutting, pasting and sending.

Naturally, when this hits the private email server....there’s an odd feature to the way this is set up. Various people can log on and read the email....besides Hillary. So, Sydney logs on....reads....comments....and then sends onto members of the inside network of the Clinton Foundation. Note, it’s very unlikely that Hillary ever sent the emails on....that was Syd’s job.

So, she can stand there and say she’s totally innocent, while everyone around her did the bad stuff. You don’t go to prison for that line of stupidity. Everyone else should go to prison though.


15 posted on 10/15/2015 6:04:14 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB

“Hillary dismisses the entire email scandal by saying it was “not the best choice,” as though she were talking about a wine pairing. But setting up her private server wasn’t done on a whim. Clinton deliberately decided to create this peculiar email arrangement, and she had plenty of time to consider the risks involved.”

Read More At Investor’s Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/101415-775646-email-scandal-three-questions-hillary-must-answer.htm#ixzz3oduflKI1
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook


16 posted on 10/15/2015 6:24:00 AM PDT by Mercat (You don't recommend better diet and exercise for a shark bite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
......calls into serious doubt her ability to put the nation’s interests above her own.

Disclosures that have been made public to date have removed all doubt..........

17 posted on 10/15/2015 6:27:36 AM PDT by varon (Don't point that finger at me unless you're prepared to have it broken off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RockyTCB; humblegunner

You’re allowed to excerpt 300 words.

Don’t just paste one sentence in an attempt to get us to click on the article, that’s really annoying.

FR is more than just a pimp for some blog.


18 posted on 10/15/2015 6:28:10 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

It’s easy to find out, just click on his user name then click on “in forum” and voila!

I will start a thread, usually with a comment, and then wait to respond. Some threads don’t need a comment. My first thought is I would rather hear about Benghazi, but maybe Benghazi happened because of her server. If the enemy was informed that security had been lowered?

I also want to know if Jarrett has her own server somewhere, or all those CAIR and Muslim Brohood people in our government. They’re probably running the NSA servers and feed them intel.

I want to know why we lost 38 on Extortion 17. Why the guys were cremated when there are photos of them laying outside the helo NOT burned and recognizable by parents...

from an interview with Michael Savage:

“Strange told Savage that on at least three separate occasions, in June 2011, his son grabbed him by the arm and announced that he had prepared his will.

Charles Strange recalled his son’s words, “Something’s going on with the team. Somebody’s leaking things out. Something’s going on.”

Savage asked: “Your son knew he was being sent to his death?”

“They knew,” Strange answered. “They knew something was up. Every one of them.”

What’s even more disturbing is that the military claimed that the bodies were so badly burned that they had to be cremated, and they were cremated without the families’ consent.

Strange believes the military is lying.

“I saw Mike’s dead body,” he said in an interview. “It was clearly recognizable. He was clutching his gun. He wasn’t burned to a crisp. Why did they cremate my boy? They didn’t need to do that. Something’s not right.” “

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/extortion-17-is-a-bigger-scandal-and-betrayal-than-benghazi/


19 posted on 10/15/2015 6:55:12 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

It doesn’t work like that.

She had codeword Sat photo’s on her system.

The markings had to be masked before uploading to Unclass.

I made it pretty clear that staff did that per Hillary’s orders.

Nobody with that access does that on their own.


20 posted on 10/15/2015 6:56:21 AM PDT by G Larry (Vote Hillary! Pro-Abortion Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson