Skip to comments.
MLB: The 6 Greatest Catchers to Ever Play the Game
CheatSheet ^
| September 20, 2015
| Michael Laurila
Posted on 09/20/2015 12:17:46 PM PDT by EveningStar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: FreeReign
Definitely. No comparison. Shortstop was a walk in the park compared to catching a double header. Physically and mentally more demanding. But I enjoyed both. Good behind the plate with an adequate arm but nhitting was my forte.
61
posted on
09/20/2015 2:01:27 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: kabar
Those were great days in New York. Willie, Yogi, Mickey and the Duke.
62
posted on
09/20/2015 2:02:49 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
Willie was a complete player. Fantastic fielder, great arm, hit for power and average, speed, and a great base stealer.
The Babe was a great player no doubt, including setting the 29 2/3 scoreless innings pitched in the WS. However, the Babe did not have the physical gifts Willie had in the field and on the base paths.
63
posted on
09/20/2015 2:04:04 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: FreeReign
But I would add Gary Carter. He was better than Piazza and equal to Fisk. I love Carter, I grew up watching him play in Montreal, but that is just silly. The numbers are not close.
64
posted on
09/20/2015 2:04:20 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Liberals support high taxes on alcohol, tobacco and wealth. And all for the same reason.)
To: stboz
McCarver couldn’t throw my grandma out. Otherwise...
65
posted on
09/20/2015 2:06:54 PM PDT
by
steve8714
(I love Geico Rick.)
To: kabar
:-) We will never agree but I sure enjoyed talking to baseball fans who know there stuff and remember how good those guys were. Thanks.
66
posted on
09/20/2015 2:08:00 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: jwalsh07
No doubt. The Yankees, Giants, and Dodgers at that time had some of the greatest players ever in the history of the game. With only 8 teams in each league, the concentration of talent was amazing. Baseball was at that time truly our national pastime.
Latin American ballplayers have saved baseball.
67
posted on
09/20/2015 2:08:16 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: Straight Vermonter
But I would add Gary Carter. He was better than Piazza and equal to Fisk.I love Carter, I grew up watching him play in Montreal, but that is just silly. The numbers are not close.
No not at all. Going by the numbers, Carter actually has a much higher WAR than Piazza. Fisk is close.
Are you a Red Sox fan?
To: Typelouder
Yes! I remember how the ‘Spos PA announcer, Claude Mouton, would make such a big thing over his name. Jooooooooooohn Baaaaaaa.....ka-bell-laaaaaaaa”.
To: A Formerly Proud Canadian
I miss the Expos, they need to come back.
70
posted on
09/20/2015 2:27:20 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: FreeReign
No, I'm a Yankee fan.
You can have your preference but I know who I would take.
.262 /.335 /.439
.308 /.377 /.545
Just for comparison Jorge Posada: .273 / .374 / .474
71
posted on
09/20/2015 2:29:36 PM PDT
by
Straight Vermonter
(Liberals support high taxes on alcohol, tobacco and wealth. And all for the same reason.)
To: EveningStar
How could anyone leave off Roy Campanella? I detest the Dodgers but you have to respect talent regardless of the uniform. Three MVP awards and eight All-Star appearances in a ten-year career. Unfortunately, his career got off to a late start and an early end but during his career, Campanella was as good as any catcher who ever played.
I would drop Fisk, Rodriguez, or Piazza in a heartbeat to include Campanella. IMO, Fisk doesn't belong in this group and Campanella's numbers weren't inflated by chemical assistance.
72
posted on
09/20/2015 2:39:56 PM PDT
by
CommerceComet
(Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
To: jwalsh07
I was a catcher until my senior year in high school when they switched me to shortstop. That was my great grandfather's position- he played for the Alleghenies and then the Pittsburgh Pirates.
73
posted on
09/20/2015 2:41:17 PM PDT
by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: Riley
Actually- he was a catcher, too.
74
posted on
09/20/2015 2:42:31 PM PDT
by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: Straight Vermonter
No, I'm a Yankee fan. Me too.
You can have your preference but I know who I would take.
.262 /.335 /.439
.308 /.377 /.545
Piazza was better offensively. Carter was much better than Piazza defensively. When you consider both offense and defense, I believe Carter was better. The Sabermetric numbers say that too.
To: EveningStar
JB number 1 for sure. I never saw Berra but I am sure I Rod was better. Bob Boone should also be on the list!
76
posted on
09/20/2015 3:15:39 PM PDT
by
gr8eman
(Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
To: gr8eman
Pudge was the best IMHO, you just didn’t even try to steal on him.
77
posted on
09/20/2015 3:16:27 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: EveningStar
78
posted on
09/20/2015 3:52:25 PM PDT
by
mkleesma
(`Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great and unsearchable things you do not know.')
To: Eccl 10:2
Thanks for posting this reality:
79
posted on
09/20/2015 3:55:58 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Either the ruling class gets new people or we the people get a new ruling class. Trump/Cruz 2016)
To: FreeReign
The only Yankee I ever really liked was Elston Howard (I was a White Sox fan). He had some good years as a catcher replacing Yogi. I read that Elston invented the batting donut. How about that?
80
posted on
09/20/2015 4:16:47 PM PDT
by
BIV
(typical white person)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson