To: Tenlein
I will note that people with security clearances were told NOT to look at news reports about Wikileaks some years ago. Even when the stuff is hanging out there on the web, if it was classified, it is still classified. If you have a verified "need to know" then you can look. But if you do not "need to know", then making an effort to peek at classified stuff is a No-No.
Same with Hillary's emails.
People with a clearance should probably be cautious about looking.
12 posted on
09/09/2015 8:12:24 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Cruz is still my #1, but Trump is impressing the hell out of me.)
To: ClearCase_guy
People with a clearance should probably be cautious about looking. I'll care a bit more about that when the OPM gets around to telling me whether or not they gave my file to the Chinese.
26 posted on
09/09/2015 8:20:08 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: ClearCase_guy
Prudent advice taken here. Thanks.
39 posted on
09/09/2015 8:34:55 PM PDT by
dp0622
To: ClearCase_guy
I will note that people with security clearances were told NOT to look at news reports about Wikileaks some years ago. Even when the stuff is hanging out there on the web, if it was classified, it is still classified. If you have a verified "need to know" then you can look. But if you do not "need to know", then making an effort to peek at classified stuff is a No-No. I'm amazed that you posted that with a straight face.
I imagine that Sergeant Donowitz could explain to a gruberment interlocutor that their interest in such things was sadly mistaken...
59 posted on
09/09/2015 10:24:36 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(Maya: "Liberalism Is What Smart Looks Like to Stupid People")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson