18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
Why do we waste bytes?
Nothing will happen to Hillary - ever.
Nothing will happen to planned parenthood - ever.
Nothing will happen to Dorkbama the Muslim - ever.
Nothing will happen to Bonehead the drunkard - ever.
Nothing will happen to McDorkell the traitor - ever.
But...
A lot will happen to that woman who refused to grant marriage licences to fudge packers, males going to university, etc, etc.
And that all will continue until things happen to liberals.
Not good things.
Yes we know all about constitutional rights to invoke the 5th amendment. But in doing so, it reinforces the stench around the Clintons, the stench which reinforces the notion that they Clintons are hiding something.
Yep. The more times he invokes the 5th, the worse it is.
This Clinton hack has refused to talk to the FBI.
Who refuses to talk to the FBI?
Maybe this poor schmuck can share a cell with Scooter Libby for a crime HE did not commit.
mb
Is Hillary even campaigning anymore? I never hear anything from her about what she wants to do to get the USA on the right track again.
“And this gentleman who was part of that process could be criminally exposed for violating the espionage statutes, especially for the grossly negligent handling of classified information, which is a 10-year felony.”
That is ridiculous. He set up the email server. He cannot be held liable for the emails that Hillary Clinton chose to send or receive using that server. The responsibility for that lies with Hillary Clinton.
Her troubles worsen when law enforcement holds her accountable for the laws that she has clearly violated, and not until then.
Until such time, Hillary Clinton is above the law.
Bryan KNOWS he’s in this up to his taint and he isn’t willing to lie like a Clinton (brazen, unapologetic and daringly combative).
The Clintons know they are protected by their notoriety to some measure along with their connections, but this man is NOT. He KNOWS how easily her “you can’t prove that” defense can be taken apart because of all the people in this world who likely have access to what he tried to contain for her. His lawyer (probably not a Clinton lawyer) told him to “plead the 5th” and hope she gets taken down before they get to him.
The real fact of the matter is that this government (it’s NSA, the FBI, et al - likely so many other countries it isn’t funny) know every email she ever sent or received.
It is just a matter of when Obama and his ghouls are ready to cut her loose. When you hear Loretta Lynch on TV making a comment about it all is the day she’ll be over and done and out.
Uh, what trouble? Anyone seen any warrants or US Marshals dispatched to Chapaqua? (sp) Nope, and with the strong republican control of the house and senate, it ain’t likely to happen either. Ref the pic of slick willie and the lyin’ king on the golf course in Martha’s Vineyard.
Doubt it. I mean a little press will be made of it but, well, it’s the Clintons.
As an aside, EVERY good Defense Atty I knew told their Clients to never, ever talk to the Police. Excellent advice even though it pissed me off. ; )
This episode shows the presumptive nominee as yet even more credible, and those serving her as yet even more united in transparency and truth. Plus she has such pretty ankles.
Hillary crossing fingers: “We were hoping he would testify (read lie)”. When given immunity the guy will be forced to tell the truth. He is now a real target for another Arkancide.
Catherine Herridge on Fox News this morning had some information on how yesterday’s closed-door hearing for Cheryl Mills went. When the Republican representatives asked questions she had “memory lapses” and said “I do not recall.” Her memory seemed fine in response to questions from Democrats.
Bryan. Hitlary is not going to care when your butt hole is being opened in sing sing.
Mrs. Bill’s email troubles will worsen or ease exactly as the Obama directed Justice Department deems to the best political advantage of Obama.
Ambassador Stevens would like to talk to the Benghazi Committee.
Drag him in and ask him the questions
Ollie North was given immunity, forced to testify, and was then prosecuted and convicted based in part on what prosecutors learned in that testimony. His conviction was thrown out on appeal because of the immunity grant.
I found this pretty good web site on this issue. Lots of tech companies sue each other all the time, in general the issues are not the type that allow one to take the fifth.
Tech Law Biz: Refusing to Testify in Civil Depositions based on the Fifth Amendment
I'm pretty confident if this is a bogus claim Judical Watch will get it smashed.
So, how much of the "immunity" talk over the last several months has been absolute disinformation? Is it time to bypass the jury box?