Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/03/2015 8:14:30 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Is that gross or net? I’d like to see it compared to welfare taken per state.


2 posted on 09/03/2015 8:16:16 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Is there a chart that shows which states suck the most from U.S. treasury


3 posted on 09/03/2015 8:17:04 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Wouldn’t this presentation be more helpful if it were normalized to the population (per capita, in other words) of each state?


4 posted on 09/03/2015 8:19:41 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The numbers are useless. A dollar in Mississippi is not equivalent to a dollar in New York. Also, the numbers are proportional to the population, so the populous states have higher numbers.


12 posted on 09/03/2015 8:50:30 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The numbers are useless. A dollar in Mississippi is not equivalent to a dollar in New York. Also, the numbers are proportional to the population, so the populous states have higher numbers.


13 posted on 09/03/2015 8:50:47 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
To illustrate differences among state economies, the folks at HowMuch.net created a chart that shows the relative economic value of each US state.

There's a subtle irony in the use of the word "NET" in this presentation. The word has two hugely disparate meanings. One is neutral, an internet word. The other, the financial term, is anything but neutral : if it were depicted in a chart, it would define the sum of the producers (positive) and the takers (negative.)

The producers is essentially the private sector, people who create useful products or services that are sought by the general population, and are freely and voluntarily sold and bought.

The takers are everything else, and it includes, among others, government overhead (the bureaucracy) at all levels, and Welfare in all its hundreds of forms, both recognizable and hidden.
There is nothing free or voluntary about those.

Most importantly, the Takers must also include the deficit spending, the debt accumulated, which is entirely due to the incompetence of the elected criminals of each state directly, and the voters who elect them year after year, indirectly.

I can't help wondering how that chart of the economic realities would look.
I am open to be proven wrong, but I absolutely believe that California has been operating solidly "in the red" for a few decades, now. As, probably, are a most other states.

I wouldn't even attempt to repeat the obvious, the Federal Government.

14 posted on 09/03/2015 8:50:59 AM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I neglected to thank you for this excellent and useful Article.
Probably the most useful thread I have seen all year. Not in terms of learning and understanding more about all the ills and abuses that plague us, but a clearer picture of the results.
15 posted on 09/03/2015 9:14:33 AM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I would have thought D.C. would have had a negative number.


18 posted on 09/03/2015 9:20:23 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I also saw this on BI. It would be more usefull as per capita. Example, Florida is almost 10% of the country population but only 4.9% of the economy.


19 posted on 09/03/2015 9:31:37 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It would be interesting to see it as a percentage of population.


21 posted on 09/03/2015 9:35:09 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

How about a chart that shows how much money is sent from each state to and how much to Mexico and each Central American country.


22 posted on 09/03/2015 9:42:06 AM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
It wasn't that long ago that WV was much more than 0.4% of our economy.
23 posted on 09/03/2015 3:30:19 PM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson