Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grave reminder not to put your feet up on the dashboard
driving.ca ^ | August 11, 2015 | Lorraine Sommerfeld

Posted on 08/12/2015 4:45:02 AM PDT by rickmichaels

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2015 4:45:02 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

The 402 is one of the most dangerous highways in North America. That’s a very unforgiving highway. The handful of times I have driven onit I can recall at least one serious or fatal accident.

CC


2 posted on 08/12/2015 4:50:07 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Sufficient unto the day are the troubles therof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

According to Bethany’s mother “There will be no early retirement. Bethany only has medical benefits through my work, and there’s no way I can let that go.”

I don’t understand. She lived in Oshawa Canada. The accident happened in Canada. Why is she not covered by the glorious Canadian universal free health care?


3 posted on 08/12/2015 4:57:26 AM PDT by joshhiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
As the brake lights flashed, her boyfriend desperately tried to avoid the suddenly stopping rig. He couldn’t.

Tragic accident, very sad.

Another contributing factor: driver probably following too closely.

I see drivers tailgating constantly on the interstate. Distance between cars should be one car length per every 10 mph, or at least 10 car lengths at 60 mph.

4 posted on 08/12/2015 4:58:43 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie ( Megyn made the debate about her petty gripe. She failed miserably. She choked, choked like a dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
As the brake lights flashed, her boyfriend desperately tried to avoid the suddenly stopping rig. He couldn’t.

Which means he wasn't allowing himself enough stopping distance. By definition.

But that's ok, people don't like it when the car ahead of them is going 73mpg and they want to go 75mph, so they get 5 inches behind that car ahead of them to psychologically "nudge them forward or out of the way". Because after all, every car you pass shaves 1.5 seconds off your arrival time and those 1.5 seconds can really add up.

It's worth risking your life, your feet, your face, your knees, your eyes to shave off a few seconds from your arrival time. Totally worth it. I get it. I absolutely do.

My wife tries to tell me that tail-gaters are demonstrating effective IQ levels lower than body lice but I explain to her that those 1.5 seconds are really monumental achievements in peoples lives and have to be respected.

5 posted on 08/12/2015 5:00:33 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump/Cruz '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshhiggins

I want to know too.


6 posted on 08/12/2015 5:07:18 AM PDT by Dallas59 (Only a fool stumbles on things behind him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joshhiggins

http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/public/programs/ohip/ohipfaq_mn.aspx


7 posted on 08/12/2015 5:09:44 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

“Which means he wasn’t allowing himself enough stopping distance. By definition.”

I had a car directly in front of me get clipped by a car pulling out. Spun him 90 degrees and then into a barrier. Pretty decent crunch. Even though the car in front of me was going sideways for a bit, I had no problem stopping - my only concern was stopping slow enough to not get rear-ended (thankfully I didn’t).

Needless to say, I always have and always will make a point of not following too closely. No matter how fast one’s reflexes are or how good their brakes are, it simply is not possible to slow down a car quickly enough to handle a car going sideways in front of you - they will slow down 10 times faster.


8 posted on 08/12/2015 5:11:17 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Why is it so bad? It looks like a straight shot on the map!


9 posted on 08/12/2015 5:12:21 AM PDT by gr8eman (Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

While that is true, don’t put your feet on the dashboard, the real issue here was the boyfriend following to close to the truck he ran into. Had he followed a safe distance behind, none of this would have occurred.


10 posted on 08/12/2015 5:14:23 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

When you consider how much farther a semi takes to stop compared to a car, the young man should have been able to stop. Along with following too close, he probably wasn’t paying attention.


11 posted on 08/12/2015 5:17:09 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

I tell my daughter not to do this often.


12 posted on 08/12/2015 5:17:16 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Chris Stevens won't be running for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

It looks like a modern interstate, too, not some two-laner with a lot of trucks on it.


13 posted on 08/12/2015 5:17:50 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

It’s a major artery into Michigan for the auto industry, so that means a lot of trucks. Plus, two of Ontario’s biggest towns (Hamilton and Toronto) are on the 402 and in both it transitions from rolling farmland to big city rather quickly. Thirdly, the 402 via the Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) is a popular “shortcut” for trucks transiting from the northeast US to the midwest. All the above translates into fairly heavy traffic volumes as well.

CC


14 posted on 08/12/2015 5:23:08 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Sufficient unto the day are the troubles therof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
driver probably following too closely.

Yup. And judging by the crush damage -- going pretty darn fast.

15 posted on 08/12/2015 5:24:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Another contributing factor: driver probably following too closely.

I see this constantly. Just from personal observation, I would say 85-90% of all drivers follow too closely. It is a bad habit. Doesn't anyone know the 2 second rule? Watch the rear tires of the car in front of you cross a shadow or mark on the highway. Count "one thousand one, one thousand two". If you cross the shadow before the count is over...you are too close.

I have avoided many fender benders and more serious accidents simply by being able to brake in time.

16 posted on 08/12/2015 5:27:37 AM PDT by Drawsing (Fools show their annoyance at once, the prudent man overlooks an insult. Proverbs 12:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
"I see drivers tailgating constantly on the interstate. Distance between cars should be one car length per every 10 mph, or at least 10 car lengths at 60 mph."

It is very difficult if not impossible to maintain those appropriate car lengths. I live in Atlanta and have to drive interstate highways everyday where the "normal" flow is going 10 miles over the speed limit (75 to 80 MPH). If I leave those appropriate car lengths between me and the car ahead, then immediately other cars will fill in the gap, furthermore I will be considered a dangerous driver for not maintaining the flow.

I don't know what the answer is, if anyone can tell me, please do, I am listening. Thank goodness we will be leaving Atlanta as soon as our new home in the mountains is ready to move into.

17 posted on 08/12/2015 5:27:46 AM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Hamilton and Toronto are nowhere near the 402.


18 posted on 08/12/2015 5:32:10 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

That’s always a possibility as well.


19 posted on 08/12/2015 5:32:15 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels; All

Now, whenever I have passengers in the back seat, and I’m on the highway, I insist they wear their seatbelts. Studies have shown that in accidents involving sudden deceleration crashes, front seat passengers, despite wearing seatbelts and having airbags around them, are often killed ( broken necks) by the bodies of unsecured rear seat passengers coming over the tops of the front seats.


20 posted on 08/12/2015 5:35:16 AM PDT by ken5050 (If the GOP canÂ’t muster the moral courage to defund Planned Parenthood, they don't deserve the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson