Posted on 08/11/2015 1:15:17 PM PDT by Heartlander
What the author decries as “The Rayciss” of medical knowledge from 100 years ago can more accurately be termed “scientific inquiry”.
Damn those evil white people and their advanced medicine that has saved the lives of millions of primitive throwbacks!
Eugenic racism in 1925 was consensus science in the field of human evolution. By 1928 there were 376 university-level courses on eugenics, and there was widespread support from scientists and other academics at leading universities -- Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanford, and Johns Hopkins, to name a few -- as well as enthusiastic support from media and government. Eugenic science was funded lavishly by the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Harriman Railroad foundation, and the wealthy businessman J.H. Kellogg. Many national and international conferences on eugenics and human evolution were hosted at leading research institutions, including the American Museum of Natural History, and eugenic science gained the imprimatur of leading scientific organizations, including the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the National Research Council. Wealthy donors created the Eugenic Records Office on Long Island, later to become the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. By the 1930s, thirty-one states in the U.S. would pass compulsory sterilization laws based on mainstream eugenic science and human evolution, and eugenics would receive the explicit endorsement of the Supreme Court in 1926. By the end of the first half of the 20th century, sixty thousand Americans had been sterilized involuntarily on the basis of consensus eugenic science.Racism and eugenics were the hallmarks of the theory of human evolution in the early 20th century, representing a clear consensus of evolutionary biologists as well as other scientists and leaders in higher education and government. There were a few dissenters, but such skeptics were disdained in mainstream scientific circles.
- Michael Egnor
Improvement of Man. - If the stock of domesticated animals can be improved, it is not unfair to ask if the health and vigor of future generations of men and women on the earth might not be improved by applying to them the laws of selection.Eugenics. - When people marry there are certain things that the individual as well as the race should demand. The most important of these is freedom from germ diseases which might be handed down to the offspring. Tuberculosis, that dread white plague which is still responsible for almost one seventh of all deaths, epilepsy, and feeble-mindedness are handicaps which it is not only unfair but criminal to hand down to posterity. The science is of being well born is called eugenics.
Parasitism and its Cost to Society. - Hundreds of families such as those described above exist to-day, spreading disease, immorality, and crime to all parts of this country. The cost to society of such families is very severe. Just as certain animals or plants become parasitic on other plants or animals, these families have become parasitic on society. They not only do harm to others by corrupting, stealing, or spreading disease, but they are actually protected and cared for by the state out of public money. Largely for them the poorhouse and the asylum exist. They take from society, but they give nothing in return. They are true parasites.
The Remedy. - If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading. Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race. Remedies of this sort have been tried successfully in Europe and are now meeting with success in this country. - Hunters Civic Biology (the textbook at the centre of the Scopes Trial)
Evolution now posits at least 4 different sources for the human race, as that term is currently understood.
Me? I just note for the record that Democrats will skewer any Republican that does not adhere to the “scientific” (read : evolutionary) line (and don’t get me wrong, I subscribe to much of what they say, in a Keith Ward kind of way— as a good lapsed Anglican). Witness Rick Perry’s experience.
But the Democrats embrace “evolution”, but spend hundreds of billions of dollars to thwart the effects of natural selection. Why?
If the name of the game is survival of the fittest, then why do we spend so much money to combat survival of the fittest? No doubt Fox News is on the job...yeah, right.
Calling people who don’t believe in Darwinism Science deniers. Consensus science; neither is there a consensus or science it is ideology through and through. Global warming, climate change same jingoism as eugenics was.
Funny that the groups of people who eugenics targeted are now supporting the deceptive eugenics under the banner of woman’s health.
Rosenau sounds a lot like B. Obama. Obama is always accusing the right of the very things he is doing or has just done. Obviously, leftists, no matter their chosen field, share the same thought processes.
What I don’t see mentioned in the article is that a very likely good reason for ‘’social Darwinism’ and eugenics in Germany is because incest was legal. I don’t happen to support either of these philosophies. However I believe it still is legal between consenting adults . I think it’s also legal in Spain, France and Italy.
I was present when Charles Drew was inducted into the Engineering & Science Hall of Fame (http://eshalloffame.org/) some years ago (I'm on the Board of Trustees and am Past President). It was a posthumous award. His grand-nephew accepted the award on his behalf.
Drew died as a result of an auto accident. There was a TV show that claimed that Drew was denied a blood transfusion because he was a Black. His grand-nephew (also Black) assured us that this wasn't the case. Drew received good care, but was too badly injured to survive.
Am I supposed to feel icky about eugenics?
Some of it seems like common sense.
What I scoff at is the conflation of hygiene/disease and criminalty.
I simply don’t get that.
Italians, maybe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.