I've always expected of FR to be mature and educated
WHY would the question be worded so obliquely and then posted to FR for us to discuss a stupid situation?
I don't think we need to "approach" illegal immigration ... I think we should prosecute it
If someone thinks we should approach prosecution, they are on the wrong side of the rule of law.
It IS, after all ... illegal ... against the law
Maybe this is what we have become or will soon be ... like timid cops (unfortunately justifiably so) who hesitate to act/respond because of a pre-conceived and the planted-in-their-brain seed that the monster they face may not be eliminated or incarcerated because of its color or something
And THIS, I think, is why Donald Trump is so popular
He talks plainly about a situation and poses a solution that looks like it just might work and it doesn't need a committee to study it or a Congress to enact a new law
I am in agreement with you, certainly. In fact, I very early on voiced my problem with VDH in his appeasing column about this in Kalin’s thread.
You can’t say it enough: ILEGAL IS ILLEGAL!
It isn’t “immigrant”, it isn’t “undocumented”, it isn’t any of those words Democrats and RINO appeasers use to try and diffuse the real problem by hiding “illegal” under “immigrants” as a group.
ILLEGAL is ILLEGAL. How hard is that to understand?
Overstaying your visa is a misdemeanor! It should be a felony with serious jail time.