Posted on 07/25/2015 10:43:51 AM PDT by conservativejoy
Despot of the Delta alerted us to this on a thread.
"Scott Walker, despite your coming to my office to give me an award, your very dumb fundraiser hit me very hard-not smart."
Is that supposed to be intelligible?
Trump knows Walker will take care of it.
Trump gave Walkers campaign the opportunity to apologize.
They did not apologize, so Trump dropped the hammer on Walker.
I think after questioning (yes, quite fairly) Perry’s IQ, Trump has a little less moral high ground to stand on here.
What part did you not understand? Walker visited Trump at some point to give him an award. Walker’s donor insulted Trump calling him a dummy.
I also understand that Trump gave Walker an opportunity to apologize. He didn’t. Now Donald is taking it to the next level.
I think between this and Walker denouncing Trump over his McCain remarks, Walker has made another bad move.
Perry was calling Trump everything in the book, including a cancer on the GOP. I guess Donald did question the intelligence of a former Texas governor who could maintain with a straight face that the illegal problem was not just as Donald said it was. Donald has certainly been vindicated as the facts come out. Perry was out of line and still is.
The fundraiser was evidently very critical of Trump.
“Walker has made another bad move.”
WHAT???????
You do understand that Walker is seeking the GOP nomination for president? Right? You do understand that one of the people he is competing against is Trump? Right?
Do you seriously believe that one candidate should be apologizing to another candidate for something someone else said? Good grief.
I think the question in each of these cases, is who strikes first. Once the candidate or their surrogate hit low, the resulting punch back is twice as hard. Perry went after Trump, and the result was strong.
It’s an interesting and unique campaign approach, but it’s clear he’s going back hard and swiftly when someone gets nasty towards him.
The Donald know how to use social media to his advantage, and to the other’s disadvantage, better than probably any one else in politics. With public distrust in the Lame Stream Media, and their overwhelming use of social media instead of “news” reports, this is a HUGE advantage for Trump.
I like Walker, after Cruz.
But anyone that wants to piss on Trump's pant leg, better be wearing hip waders.
Perry won’t even make to the first tier debate stage.
He will be in the Fox forum playing with Linda Graham.
Sounds like it was written by a 14 year old.
I’ve been getting the feeling that Walker is a stealth candidate for someone and can’t or won’t speak for himself. Better he’s FIRED rather than he gains more traction before we know what and who he represents.
Walker has sided with Jeb and the Establishment.....
When the person is associated with the candidate, it might be a good idea to distance oneself from such remarks.
Walker, of 2.59 grade point average fame, does not need to be associated with insulting the intelligence of a business genius like Donald Trump.
This is the second time Walker has spoken out against Trump, the first time denouncing him over McCain.
Cruz is competing against Trump as well. He does not engage in such attacks.
Incoming fire from his Iowa speech..lol
“Now let’s talk about a President Walker. Whose state, by the way, is a disaster! But I won’t say that.”
“anyone that wants to piss on Trump’s pant leg, better be wearing hip waders.”
LOL! They stepped in it for sure!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.