Enumerate the charges and evidence.
Look at the bright side: two years from now you’ll be asking who can stop Hillary.
After January 20, 2017, if the traitor refused to leave our White House, the rules change. In that unlikely event, someone else may assert the necessary authority.
The Constitution ceased to be effective when we swore in an usurper. He was not eligible to be President, but nobody stopped him.
Forfeit part
Forfeit all
Who? We all do. And I’m ready to go when you are. Under the 10th Amendment, powers reserved to the people, The citizenry has the authority to act when gummint fails. A provisional trial on the steps of SCOTUS is one way we can do it. We need a clear Bill of Particulars which none of the legal geniuses seems capable of scratching together so far. But with that in hand the next step is to organize a summary trial.
It’s how we cleaned up the Pacific Islands after WW II and it can work now.
Remember: When in the course of human events-——
The Sheeple...
Considering that the Republican Congress has abrogated their constitutional powers and authority, that leaves the courts. Some judges try.
Those in elective governmental positions who do not oppose the unconstitutional actions are complicit in them.
Nobody. He has to be removed from office first.
A president is subject to normal arrest should he “step out onto Pennsylvania Avenue and gun down a random individual”.
For violating the Constitution, I don’t think there’s any arrest. Just impeachment and trial by Congress. An arrest for other felonies could theoretically follow.
This Congress won’t veto clown nominees, impeach an idiot judge, or cut the budget of an out of control agency. This is functionally a dictatorship.
Complicit EXEMPT undocumented Democrats (RINOS):
"They think we care, Our Master, Prophet and beloved King."
I do......but the people I sent to do it keep goofing it up.
The congress could hold Obastard accountable....impeachment and removal form office.
I have heard that only the ayatollah has the authority.
At this point, some stupid left wing nut job who thinks Obamalamadingdong is not Marxist enough would be my guess. But don’t worry, the Lame Stream Media will blame talk radio, the TEA party, and conservatives.
.
What difference does it make?
Out of curiosity, I decided to write to the head of a forensic group that I found on the internet. Below is her quick and detailed response to my June 6, 2015 email.
I thought that some readers here at free republic might be interested in what she said.
Obama's 1980 Selective Service signature. Is it a forgery? Out of curiosity, I wrote to the head of a forensic group I found on the internet.
kristensinger1@gmail.com
She was kind enough to quickly respond to my letter. I found her explanation very detailed.
And I appreciated very much that she wrote such a detailed explanation.
As I read her response, two things stood out: It seems that most forensic experts would be reluctant to look at Obama's handwriting because (1) examining documents from the internet is very difficult, and (2) forensic experts would want to see many samples of Obama's handwriting from that period, not just one or two samples.
*****
Dear MIRSE,
Thank you for your email. While it would be very interesting to examine these signatures, let me share with you why it cannot be done adequately with what is available.
Forensic Document Examiners require the following criteria for a comprehensive examination:
1. Original documents
2. Comparable questioned and known writing (cursive to cursive, hand print to hand print, uppercase hand print to upper case hand print, etc).
3. Known writing that is produced close in date to the questioned material being examined. And in the case of the questioned and known writing you have specified, young Obama was still in his formative writing years, which means there can be a lot of writing variation, so many signatures close in date to the questioned date would be needed.
Legitimate document examiners would be wary to examine anything from the internet.
Furthermore, digital images are often lacking in sufficient resolution, and are also susceptible to manipulation.
I hope this helps your curiosity somewhat. I looked briefly at the selective service and the TIME images, and quickly realized that a LOT of known signatures from that time period, along with good quality copies, or the originals, would be required to conduct the appropriate exams. Kirsten
