Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickensoup

It was sexual relations. He was touching them, and coming on to them, in a sexual manor. Don’t get all Monica Lewinsky on me.


15 posted on 05/26/2015 8:04:32 PM PDT by Morgana ( Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Morgana
WHAT A CROCK SH--!!!
26 posted on 05/26/2015 8:13:07 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I am not getting Lewinsky.

Molestation is not incest. No matter how you cut it. Was it sexual molestation? Yes. No kidding.

Is it wrong?

Yes.

Has this and more been a forever factor in countless lives worldwide between children and teens?

Yes.

And it has been dealt with.

So my ultimate question is: So what?

This drama is out of the Alinsky playbook.

Hang your opposition on their own rules.

Using Soviet tactics of turning sex abuse into a totem that brings out unthinking visceral reactions.

Sexual abuse allegations are the tar babies of our time.


30 posted on 05/26/2015 8:20:30 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

No, it wasn’t “sexual relations.” Everyone has different definitions. I think the Duggars dealt with the situation correctly. The whole thing would have been more traumatic dealing with secular/public counseling. They didn’t let the kid get away with anything.


49 posted on 05/26/2015 9:19:53 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson