This is their textbook.............
Posted on 04/23/2015 10:38:47 AM PDT by smokingfrog
The course, called “Making Sense of Climate Denial”, will start next week, and is free and entirely online.
University of Queensland Global Change Institute climate communication fellow John Cook is the course coordinator as well as founder of the climate science myth debunking website Skeptical Science.
“Ninety-seven per cent of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming; however, less than half of Australians are aware of humanity’s role in climate change, while half of the US Senate has voted that humans aren’t causing global warming,” Cook said.
“This free course explains why there is such a huge gap between the scientific community and the public. Our course looks at what’s driving climate science denial and the most common myths about climate change.”
(Excerpt) Read more at reneweconomy.com.au ...
This is their textbook.............
This is a clear example of protesting too much.
If the results of their studies were sound, fact-based, repeatable and conclusive, they would not need to offer “classes” on how to counter those who question them.
Neither would they feel the need to call for a modern-day Inquisition to hunt down, destroy, silence and/or imprison those who question them.
This is not science - it is a religion - and a pretty wacky one at that.
Sounds like they need a lot of server traffic.
I already think Global Warming is just a pile of Obama Droppings ,I don’t need a course ,LOL
” “Ninety-seven per cent of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming;”
No measurable warming in 18 years.
Is THIS man made too ?
In fact, you could tie it in with the "... for Dummies" series of how-to books, since the Dummy demographic constitutes the largest segment of liberals, who are more than willing to be led by the hand into believing things that aren't true.
The 97 Percent Climate Change Consensus That Wasn’t
Heartlander Magazine: http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2015/04/06/97-percent-climate-change-consensus-wasnt
The video to promote the course makes it look like it’s all about dealing with US and the only reason they might be so anxious about converting US, that I can make out, is to get our consensus for a bunch of hare-brained government ‘solutions.’ Otherwise, why would they care what we think? They should be happy in their little self-satisfied cocoon and get on with the doomsday fetish.
Of course(?) they most assuredly will also offer teachings about how to counter the warmunists agenda. Right? I mean it’s only fair. LOL! If life were “fair”, I’d have as much money as the kardouchians. Proud to be a DENIER! So, travelers let me pose some simple questions/definable thoughts to you:
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet’
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Get back to us when you can “positively” answer these. Since warmunists are SOOOOOOOO smart it should be easy.
P.S. If you’ve already seen these questions, feel free to add some of your own.
LOL!
Watts Up With That
Cook is such and arse. SkS is one of the most intolerant websites with whom I have ever engaged. They lie and delete offensive posts, the ones that present the facts. Then they send you to a dead thread to continue the debate, saying that you have gone OT. That means you have won the debate. It has happened many time to me because I know what I am talking about. CO2-induced global warming is a fraud for a global energy tax.
-Franks
Who here is going to take the class? It should be entitled: Beginning Apologetics for Warming Doctrine. People with an interest in the reasoning and logic of cults should be sure to take advantage of this freebee scheme promoting climate terrorism.
“If the results of their studies were sound, fact-based, repeatable and conclusive, they would not need to offer “classes” on how to counter those who question them.”
A perfect statement!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.