Your statement shows a total ignorance, perhaps deliberate for ideological reasons, but ignorance of the ethnic & historical realities of the South African sub-continent.
Have you ever been to South Africa? If you had you might appreciate the difference between the concept of a nation, and the borders drawn by the former Colonial power. The various nations of South Africa--for they are various nations--have different racial origins, to be sure. They also have different languages, and even radically different types of native architecture. The idea--now in practice of having a common voter role may appear to be idealistic to you--and certainly it appeals to those seeking a World Government;--but it effectively undermines the continuity of all those distinct nations.
Now, for example, are you aware of how the Indaba institution was applied by the Zulu Monarchy? It is a form of Democracy, but not one with much in common with the practices in a New England Town Meeting.
Apartheid has been grossly misrepresented by the Internationalists in the Western Media. It was basically intended to reverse the lumping of those distinct Nations together by the former Colonial power, and was never fully implemented because of industry's desire for cheap labor. But some of the programs that were implemented were shortly followed by similar programs in the United States, that also--as in South Africa--provided incentives to locate industry where it would be most convenient to non-White populations. In any event, it was not intended to hold any group back; rather premised on the very Conservative position that people were entitled to build on their own cultural heritage, rather than be homogenized in the way sought by the "diversity" cult in American Academia.
The Whites are not the only victims of what has been happening in Africa, of course. The same mentality that assailed South Africa in the 1960s through 1990, also denied ethnic rights to the Christian Ibos in Nigeria; to Tshombe's tribe in Katanga in the former Belgian Congo. The attack is on any tribe or nation, of any race, that would opt out of the pursuit of a new world order.
“Apartheid has been grossly misrepresented by the Internationalists in the Western Media.”
You’re really getting desperate.
“It was basically intended to reverse the lumping of those distinct Nations together by the former Colonial power, and was never fully implemented because of industry’s desire for cheap labor.”
Apartheid was invented by whites, specifically Afrikaaners, as a way to practice segregation in a world which was turning against racial segregation. The “homeland” idea was used as cover and as a system of coercion. That is why the Zulu’s “homeland” was such a gerrymanded nonsense. That’s why the Japanese were designated as “honorary whitemen” when they visited South Africa. You’re not only a sucker for believing what you believe, but you’re the worst kind of sucker.