Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: EBH
It shouldn't matter.

If a cop sees someone with what appears to be a gun, or shaped like a gun, he must assume danger.

3 posted on 04/08/2015 2:45:28 PM PDT by PROCON (It's easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled -- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PROCON
If a cop sees someone with what appears to be a gun, or shaped like a gun, he must assume danger.

Yet a citizen should not assume the same when they see a cop with a gun?

19 posted on 04/08/2015 3:00:50 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: PROCON
If a cop sees someone with what appears to be a gun, or shaped like a gun, he must assume danger.

No, a police officer and anyone else for that matter is obliged to look at the overall context of the situation and determine if they or anyone else are in danger. And more precisely in most states if they are in imminent danger.

By your logic a police officer would be justified in assuming "danger" if he walked into the local gun store and saw the owner and a customer handling a firearm.

Just because you come across someone carrying a firearm doesn't mean you are in danger. Why around here we see people with firearms frequently. Sometimes they are even moving furtively through the woods in camouflage outfits. And sometimes you see them with a dead deer or turkey too.

38 posted on 04/08/2015 4:29:07 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson