Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VANITY: "Birdman" Yuck!
NONE | March 22, 2015 | Self

Posted on 03/22/2015 11:44:43 AM PDT by fatnotlazy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: fatnotlazy

I hadn’t even heard of it, but now if I see it at our local theater, I’ll know not to bother with it.

Thanks. I hate when wasting time and money on garbage.


21 posted on 03/22/2015 12:25:22 PM PDT by BykrBayb (Where there is life, there is hope. - Terri Schiavo ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Yeah I agree. I guess it was really written, directed, and filmed for those in Hollywood who ‘get’ this tripe. It was supposed to be “deep thinking” and “artsy” whatever that means but I found it trivial, slow and tedious. Most in Hollywood have lost all connection to the people who watch their movies.

Pass.


22 posted on 03/22/2015 12:28:04 PM PDT by corlorde (Oath Keeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Two words: American Sniper. You won't be disappointed.
23 posted on 03/22/2015 12:28:10 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait. Do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Best Movie by the Academy usually means pure garbage. Sounds like Bridman keeps the streak going.


24 posted on 03/22/2015 12:29:43 PM PDT by bray (Palin/Cruz to the WH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
but really, does the F word have to appear in every sentence of dialogue?

Hollywood is largely responsible for the crassification of society.

25 posted on 03/22/2015 12:33:04 PM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania
Birdman is self-involved Hollywood narcissism.

Do you think the filmmakers weren't aware of the narcissism in their profession?

I haven't seen the movie, but from what people are saying it sounds like Fellini, who had to have been aware of how grating his characters were, but still produced some great films.

26 posted on 03/22/2015 12:35:40 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan
American Sniper is on my list...once it shows up in Netflix.
27 posted on 03/22/2015 12:38:23 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

The best move I’ve seen in decades was “Guardians of the Galaxy”.....Very well written and the acting was superb!


28 posted on 03/22/2015 12:39:42 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Uncle Sy: "Beavers are like Ninjas, they only come out at night and they're hard to find")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
With all due respect, I disagree with you, fatnotlazy.

Perhaps you need to be a New-Yorka (You know, the world ends at the Hudson) to appreciate it.

The film exceeded my expectations.

If you lived and/or worked in the city you would have a better understanding of what was going on.

The cinematography, photography, story-telling, acting, direction, was superb.

Keaton and Norton were excellent.

It was a magic carpet ride.

29 posted on 03/22/2015 12:39:50 PM PDT by UnBubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
You'd have been much better off watching Birdplane.
30 posted on 03/22/2015 12:44:41 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt; fatnotlazy
The art part of the movie is that... [paraphrasing from reviews] "...an actor wants to produce a play so he doesn't have to make yet another superhero movie."

Basically, anybody outside the "biz" doesn't empathize with Keaton's character, but the H'wood voters do.

I looked up the IMDB user comments on the film, sorting by "Hated It".

Just the comment titles are hilarious, let alone the specific jabs.

31 posted on 03/22/2015 12:56:32 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UnBubba
Maybe you're on to something. My friend who loved the movie loves New York. She doesn't live there, but she visits several times a year. I've been there a few times, and it wasn't my cup of tea. I suppose you have to be really sophisticated to appreciate NY. I'm just a small-town gal who likes the simple things.
32 posted on 03/22/2015 1:04:55 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
Thanks for the heads up!

I hate it when a movie becomes incomprehensible in order to be "Arty".

The following is a review I wrote for an eagerly awaited documentary about Giuseppe Verdi that was also ruined by this attitude. Of course, there weren't any "F Bombs", but there may have well have had them the movie was so "ugly":

This was very disappointing...and I LOVE the music of Verdi. The sound quality was uneven, causing me to have to turn the sound up and down as I watched, and the Operatic excerpts all used the same dreary, unimaginative set and the same costumes, which looked like rejects from the Goodwill Store. It was interesting to note that Verdi wished to control every aspect of the production, which I would assume also meant the sets and costumes. So, in doing violence to this aspect of Verdi's art, the producers were going against the artist's wishes, perhaps in order to be minimalist and avant guarde.

There were no vocal selections from the two most beloved of Verdi's Operas, "La Traviata" and "Aida", just one orchestral selection each, while other more obscure works were presented with very long segments, all on the same "abandoned Detroit apartment" set wearing black overcoats.

Rent the operas themselves and enjoy, rather than allow yourself to be bored and depressed by this unfortunate attempt to make opera"relevant" to our post-modern, minimalist, colorless, monochromatic malaise of a culture! I'd rather just listen to the singers (who were quite good!) on cd, than watch them in this celebration of industrial ugliness.


I did not think that Netflix would publish my review because it was so negative...but they DID!
33 posted on 03/22/2015 1:05:07 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

I enjoyed it very much. Loved the technical aspect of the “one shot” look and enjoyed Keaton’s and Ed Norton’s acting. Well worth the time and money.


34 posted on 03/22/2015 1:13:58 PM PDT by needmorePaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

the most excruciating 2 or so hours of my life

Felt tht way about “Brazil”


35 posted on 03/22/2015 1:15:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

New York, New York. A city so nice, they named it twice.


36 posted on 03/22/2015 1:20:00 PM PDT by UnBubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

I liked it a lot, though it left me depressed. But I’d rather be a little depressed than bored.

Birdman has starred in mindless pictures, like Batman (Which Michael Keaton actuarially starred in) but now, he is older and wants to attempt a real acting job onstage, something with depth and meaning. Everything works against him. His family is a mess, his friends berate him.

I think many of us have wanted to do more meaningful work in our lives, but had to settle for jobs that paid the bills but didn’t connect with our hearts and souls and the talents we know — or think we know—we have. Birdman was very brave to try so hard to become a real actor….though it ended up badly. At least he tried.

When I lived in SoCal, I often saw famous TV actors from banal, stupid, but successful TV series onstage doing Shakespeare and other classical plays, some very successfully. The more difficult roles certainly paid less, but were more satisfying for the actors. And for me.

And thus, the struggle of Birdman…..


37 posted on 03/22/2015 1:28:10 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Too bad. I love Michael Keaton.


38 posted on 03/22/2015 1:30:34 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnBubba

Haven’t seen it..if I want to see a Birdman movie, I’ll stick with Burt Lancaster!


39 posted on 03/22/2015 1:32:48 PM PDT by Radagast the Fool (At my signal, UNLEASH PALIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Not so much quirky but perhaps one of the topics voters like, one of their own or about the difficulty of their art. I guess anyway, my wife and I bailed after 30 minutes.

But we did discuss our Academy winner about a mentally challenged, mixed race woman, with AIDS, working to be an actor whose white father abused her.

We figured it would be a shoo in.


40 posted on 03/22/2015 1:37:18 PM PDT by Proud_texan ("Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - PK Dick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson