Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Cloud' over Mars leaves scientists baffled
Phys dot Org ^ | February 16, 2015 | unattributed

Posted on 02/16/2015 5:29:57 PM PST by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: KoRn; SunkenCiv; All

The source I first saw on this subject said this haze was also seen about a year previously. If it was in the same area, then I think that rules out an impact event.


61 posted on 02/17/2015 9:34:50 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KoRn; SunkenCiv; All

I forgot to include this article also on the mars story.

http://www.aol.com/article/2015/02/17/scientists-baffled-by-mysterious-haze-on-mars/21143468/?ncid=webmail11


62 posted on 02/17/2015 9:36:25 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Thanks g. None of the sources I've been able to read (the Nature source might be nice, but it requires authorization) say that there have been multiple events in the same spot -- merely that two amateurs saw a similar phenomenon twice (well, three times) in 2012. Here's the snip from the BBC piece linked out of that AOL piece.
The vast plume was initially spotted by amateur astronomers in 2012, and appeared twice before vanishing. Scientists have now analysed the images and say that the formation, stretching for more than 1,000km, is larger than any seen before. The vast, bright haze lasted for about 10 days. A month later, it reappeared for the same length of time. But it has not been seen since.

63 posted on 02/18/2015 12:26:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

No prob’. It’s interesting that the science-critter gets quoted in some sources that these plumes shouldn’t be seen at such high altitudes, that it would mean the Earthlings’ understanding of the atmosphere of Mars is incorrect (due to the low density). Obviously it *has* to be either from an impact, or from a volcano, but again, the latter would mean current volcanic activity, and the most recent known was about 2 million years ago. :’)


64 posted on 02/18/2015 12:29:39 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson