Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Full Title: In the quantum world, the future affects the past: Hindsight and foresight together more accurately 'predict' a quantum system’s state

In short, the big shocker in this paper: "in the quantum world time runs both backward and forward whereas in the classical world it only runs forward."

1 posted on 02/09/2015 1:48:40 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: LibWhacker

I might cite the Heisenberg Principle.

Or I might not.


2 posted on 02/09/2015 1:53:06 PM PST by freedumb2003 (AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I knew you were going to post that...


3 posted on 02/09/2015 1:53:51 PM PST by DanielRedfoot (Creepy Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
In the quantum world, the future predicts the past.

In a Newtonian world, hindsight is 20/20.

4 posted on 02/09/2015 1:55:49 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Where’s that darn cat?


5 posted on 02/09/2015 1:58:44 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Not to sound like a know-it-all, but the future affecting the past on a quantum level is not only decades-old theory, but there are existing machines that work on this principle.

Here’s a patent application I wrote on such a device: http://www.google.com/patents/US8068740


6 posted on 02/09/2015 1:58:50 PM PST by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

7 posted on 02/09/2015 2:00:15 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

“The answer, so obvious in the case of the murder mystery...”

Sheesh....I’m not even sure about the answer to this!


8 posted on 02/09/2015 2:00:34 PM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe on the quantum level, there is no such thing as ‘time’.


12 posted on 02/09/2015 2:06:10 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Watch Master Ken defeat the “speed of light” limit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hMoA7Q75cg

Begin at about 4:20 if you are particularly impatient.


13 posted on 02/09/2015 2:13:12 PM PST by Zuse (I am disrupted! I am offended! I am insulted! I am outraged!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Obviously false.
(Effect follows cause)


18 posted on 02/09/2015 2:38:12 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

“It’s not clear why in the real world, the world made up of many particles, time only goes forward and entropy always increases,” Murch said. “But many people are working on that problem and I expect it will be solved in a few years,” he said.

if you can ask that question, you’re completely in the dark.


19 posted on 02/09/2015 2:40:42 PM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

can anything we do today cause someone else to win the 2008 and 2012 elections?


20 posted on 02/09/2015 2:46:58 PM PST by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is what passes as “science” these days?


21 posted on 02/09/2015 2:51:44 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

"You've been time tripping again, haven't you Billy?"

22 posted on 02/09/2015 3:03:08 PM PST by Hugin ("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I read this yesterday.....and tomorrow.


23 posted on 02/09/2015 3:25:24 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Is that related to me never knowing what I’m going to do even one second from now until I do it? ... :-) ...


24 posted on 02/09/2015 3:36:20 PM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
"in the quantum world time runs both backward and forward whereas in the classical world it only runs forward."

Old news ...


25 posted on 02/09/2015 3:52:00 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
The particle's state is not merely unknown, but truly undefined before it is measured. The act of measurement itself that forces the particle to collapse to a definite state.

Well, then, I guess we'd pretty much have to believe whatever you told us about it, wouldn't we?

29 posted on 02/09/2015 4:23:59 PM PST by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

funny if you say the future effects the past

isn’t it just as logical to say past is seeing in to the probable future adjusting accordingly..

just like we do ..

we try again see what’s going to happen and plan ahead...

The probable different “futures” effects the what happens in the now.. or if you will the “past” from the future’s perspective


30 posted on 02/09/2015 4:34:12 PM PST by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is like the physicists who thus come down to multi-verse theory and parallel worlds where all things are possible on the flimsiest proof, assume aliens or advanced humans may exist or even manipulate such, then deny a God though they agree that the Big Bang exists.


31 posted on 02/09/2015 4:35:22 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson