Skip to comments.
In the quantum world, the future affects the past: Hindsight and foresight together...
Science Daily ^
| 2/9/15
Posted on 02/09/2015 1:48:40 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Full Title: In the quantum world, the future affects the past: Hindsight and foresight together more accurately 'predict' a quantum systems state
In short, the big shocker in this paper: "in the quantum world time runs both backward and forward whereas in the classical world it only runs forward."
To: LibWhacker
I might cite the Heisenberg Principle.
Or I might not.
2
posted on
02/09/2015 1:53:06 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
To: LibWhacker
I knew you were going to post that...
3
posted on
02/09/2015 1:53:51 PM PST
by
DanielRedfoot
(Creepy Ass Cracker)
To: LibWhacker
In the quantum world, the future predicts the past. In a Newtonian world, hindsight is 20/20.
4
posted on
02/09/2015 1:55:49 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: LibWhacker
To: LibWhacker
Not to sound like a know-it-all, but the future affecting the past on a quantum level is not only decades-old theory, but there are existing machines that work on this principle.
Here’s a patent application I wrote on such a device: http://www.google.com/patents/US8068740
6
posted on
02/09/2015 1:58:50 PM PST
by
Smedley
(It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
To: LibWhacker
7
posted on
02/09/2015 2:00:15 PM PST
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: LibWhacker
“The answer, so obvious in the case of the murder mystery...”
Sheesh....I’m not even sure about the answer to this!
To: freedumb2003
9
posted on
02/09/2015 2:02:43 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: Smedley
10
posted on
02/09/2015 2:02:43 PM PST
by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
11
posted on
02/09/2015 2:05:38 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
To: LibWhacker
Maybe on the quantum level, there is no such thing as ‘time’.
12
posted on
02/09/2015 2:06:10 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: LibWhacker
13
posted on
02/09/2015 2:13:12 PM PST
by
Zuse
(I am disrupted! I am offended! I am insulted! I am outraged!)
To: freedumb2003
14
posted on
02/09/2015 2:16:51 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
To: freedumb2003
I’m not so certain about that. Or maybe I am.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Ah.
I never really watched that show. I tried to watch from the beginning and after 2 episodes I was bored to tears and gave up.
So I don’t quite get it, sorry :(
16
posted on
02/09/2015 2:32:56 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(AGW: Settled Science? If so, there would only be one model and it would agree with measurements)
To: colorado tanker
Turned into a Mog — half man and half dog.
Now he’s his own best friend.
17
posted on
02/09/2015 2:36:10 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: LibWhacker
Obviously false.
(Effect follows cause)
18
posted on
02/09/2015 2:38:12 PM PST
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: LibWhacker
“It’s not clear why in the real world, the world made up of many particles, time only goes forward and entropy always increases,” Murch said. “But many people are working on that problem and I expect it will be solved in a few years,” he said.
if you can ask that question, you’re completely in the dark.
19
posted on
02/09/2015 2:40:42 PM PST
by
dadfly
To: LibWhacker
can anything we do today cause someone else to win the 2008 and 2012 elections?
20
posted on
02/09/2015 2:46:58 PM PST
by
faithhopecharity
((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson