Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Wedding Cake (and Lack Thereof) May Cost Oregon Bakers $150,000
http://reason.com ^ | |Feb. 3, 2015 10:55 am | Scott Shackford

Posted on 02/03/2015 8:17:14 AM PST by redreno

The latest on the wedding cake beat: The state of Oregon has formally ruled that a bakery in Gresham discriminated against a gay couple who wanted to purchase a wedding cake. The state’s Bureau of Labor and Industries could fine the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa, which has since closed its doors and become a home bakery in response to the controversy, up to $150,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at reason.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Society
KEYWORDS: cakes; gresham; homosexualagenda; oregon; ssm

1 posted on 02/03/2015 8:17:15 AM PST by redreno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redreno

I’d leave the state and change my identity before I paid these bast**ds one red cent.


2 posted on 02/03/2015 8:27:58 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

It sounds as if the state of Oregon is discriminating against them.


3 posted on 02/03/2015 8:29:29 AM PST by Ingtar (Is this the Ebola and rumors of Ebola mentioned in the Bible?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redreno

$150,000 ?

Shouldn’t the state of Oregon just place the bakery owners in the middle of an arena full of hungry lions?

Precident set some 1800 years ago in Italy.


4 posted on 02/03/2015 8:30:49 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

$150,000 fine for refusing to bake a cake rises to the level of cruel and unusual punishment.

Confiscatory tickets are highway robbery and a way to continue funding more government.


5 posted on 02/03/2015 8:35:56 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno
It looks like a bill of attainder

A "bill of attainder" is any act of a legislative body declaring a person or group of persons guilty of a crime and assessing a punishment without the benefit of trial. The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, paragraph 3 provides that: "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law will be passed."

Bills of attainder were commonly used in England during the 18th century and were applied to the British colonies. Anger over the application of bills attainder in the colonies was one of the motivations for the American Revolution.

As James Madison wrote in, Federalist Number 44, "Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligations of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation. ... The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences, in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the more-industrious and less-informed part of the community."


6 posted on 02/03/2015 8:54:45 AM PST by RedMDer (I don't listen to Liars but when I do I know it's Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

Sounds like James Madison was way ahead in his thinking & that the Constitution is very clear on this point. There seem to be many who want to push a concept & then hopefully find a court who will back them up no matter how ludicrous their argument is.


7 posted on 02/03/2015 9:17:13 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: redreno

People in OR embrace any and all aspects of liberalism and will forever.


8 posted on 02/03/2015 9:25:27 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

They say that “cruel and unusual punishment” applies only in criminal cases, not the popular liberal civil suits like this one.


9 posted on 02/03/2015 9:26:35 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Another question came to mind in this situation. Let’s say the bakery is fined the 150k & the fine is collected. Where does that money go? To the ones who were “offended” or is it plowed back into the state treasury where either way it will serve to promote more of the same abuse?


10 posted on 02/03/2015 9:27:08 AM PST by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Freedom means being forced to endorse homosexuality.


11 posted on 02/03/2015 9:32:07 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldtech
Did you notice this part?

Anger over the application of bills attainder in the colonies was one of the motivations for the American Revolution.

12 posted on 02/03/2015 9:42:10 AM PST by RedMDer (I don't listen to Liars but when I do I know it's Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Bake the cake....If anyone in their right mind would eat a cake that someone was FORCED to bake for them....they aren’t in their right mind...X-Lax makes a delicious chocolate frosting and of course you can’t guarantee that all of your employees washed their hands every time that they are supposed to and etc. etc.


13 posted on 02/03/2015 9:56:52 AM PST by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

Homosexuals who act on their homosexual desires are sinful (according to the Bible, which I accept as absolute truth - God does not make mistakes). I can live with sinful friends and neighbors.

Those who filed this lawsuit are pure evil. They are absolutely disgusting and should be shunned by decent people for the rest of their lives - shunned because they are thugs and bullies, not because they are gay.


14 posted on 02/03/2015 10:57:06 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

The bakers need to file BK let them go eat cake elsewhere!!!!!!


15 posted on 02/03/2015 10:59:35 AM PST by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Like the people that refused to bake the cake?


16 posted on 02/03/2015 11:09:07 AM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat
The bakers need to file BK let them go eat cake elsewhere!!!!!!

Agreed. I would rather destroy everything I own and declare bankruptcy than pay a fine of this nature and directly support those who filed this evil lawsuit.

17 posted on 02/03/2015 11:13:15 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson