Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Shroud of Turin (L) St. Peter's Veronica's Veil (R)

What do you think?

3 posted on 02/02/2015 7:48:41 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Needs peer review. Could be very important.


6 posted on 02/02/2015 8:02:23 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Life is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

He removed the high places, and brake the images, and cut down the groves, and brake in pieces the brasen serpent that Moses had made: for unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to it: and he called it Nehushtan.

2 Kings 18:4


7 posted on 02/02/2015 8:03:08 PM PST by javie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I think a rank amateur made the shroud on the right...


11 posted on 02/02/2015 8:19:49 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
note the three spot injury markings right of Vatican Veil nose which appear on Turin Shroud face left side of nose. Unlike normal negative film processing which reverses from left to right Angular Filming does not reverse from left to right,it processes the actual negative image without reversal.

www.veronica-veil.com

I don't understand this. Generally, the site looks very hastily put together, with typos, and with cryptic explanations that don't really explain.

This is some additional material: www.academia.edu/9520118/Veronicaveilpaper, but the only name accociated with the paper is Vincent Ruello himself.

The Hot Flow Anomaly is a legit discovery, but I don't see Ruello associated with it. How hard was it to provide a reference to some research paper on that?

Here's a scathing post about him: The Worldwide Conspiracy to Ignore Vincenzo Giovanni Ruello

12 posted on 02/02/2015 8:21:14 PM PST by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

It’s pretty obvious that that is NOT a ROMAN numeral three.


31 posted on 02/03/2015 5:48:47 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson